Matter
A FIRM v MG (High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance HCCT 26/2021)
- 21 July 2020Arbitration
21 July 2020Arbitration
Arbitral Award dated 21 July 2020
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre
- Decision summary
- The arbitrator dismissed the claims under the Retainer Agreement after finding that the Anderson Guangzhou entity was not shown to be the contracting party entitled to commence the arbitration.
Supporting details
5 participantsAnderson & Anderson (Guangzhou) Consultation Co., Limited
Anderson & Anderson LLP
- Representative
- David Buxbaum (For: Anderson & Anderson LLP)
MG
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre
- Institutional administrator
- Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre
7 months and 25 days later · 240 days
- 18 March 2021Hong Kong
18 March 2021Hong Kong
Order of the High Court of Hong Kong dated 18 March 2021
High Court of Hong Kong
- Decision summary
- The court granted A FIRM's application to transfer the proceedings to the Construction and Arbitration List and ordered the action to continue as if commenced by Originating Summons.
Supporting details
3 participants10 months and 29 days later · 335 days
- 16 February 2022Hong Kong
16 February 2022Hong Kong
Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance in the case HCCT 26/2021 dated 16 February 2022
High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 463
- Decision summary
- The court dismissed A FIRM's application to set aside the 21 July 2020 arbitral award, holding that the alleged failure to disclose a person assisting MG did not establish a ground under Article 34(2) of the UNCITRAL Model Law. It also ordered the action's costs to be paid by A FIRM on an indemnity basis.
Supporting details
8 authorities · 5 participantsA FIRM
- Representative
- Clare Leung (For: A FIRM)
- Representative
- Chin & Associates (For: A FIRM)
MG
High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance
- Judge
- Mimmie Chan