Arbitral Digest

Matter

Acierinox materiel v Doosan Infracore Europe SRO and Sofemat (Court of Cassation T 22-15.445)

  1. 9 June 2021France

    9 June 2021France

    Interim order of the Rouen Commercial Court dated 9 June 2021

    Rouen Commercial Court

    Decision summary
    The president of the Rouen Commercial Court declared the interim judge materially competent to hear Acierinox's requests in the dispute arising from the exclusive distribution agreement between Doosan and Acierinox.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Doosan Infracore Europe SRO
    Acierinox materiel
    Sofemat
    Rouen Commercial Court

    7 months and 25 days later · 239 days

  2. 3 February 2022France

    3 February 2022France

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Rouen dated 3 February 2022

    Court of Appeal of Rouen

    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal of Rouen held that the president of the Rouen Commercial Court had material competence to hear Acierinox's requests for document production, a prohibition on collaboration with Sofemat, and payment of a provision in the dispute over the exclusive distribution agreement.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Doosan Infracore Europe SRO
    Acierinox materiel
    Sofemat
    Court of Appeal of Rouen

    1 year and 26 days later · 391 days

  3. 1 March 2023France

    1 March 2023France

    Decision of the Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber in the case T 22-15.445 dated 1 March 2023

    Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber

    Case no.
    T 22-15.445
    Citation
    131 FS-B
    Decision summary
    The Court of Cassation partially quashed the Court of Appeal of Rouen's 3 February 2022 judgment. It upheld the ruling that the president of the Rouen Commercial Court had material competence over Acierinox's request for a certified list of equipment sold in Basse-Normandy by Sofemat and Doosan from 1 January to 1 June 2021, but quashed the remaining competence ruling concerning the requested prohibition on collaboration with Sofemat and the payment of a provision because urgency had to be assessed when the court ruled. It remitted the remaining proceedings to the Court of Appeal of Paris and ordered Acierinox to pay the costs.

    Supporting details

    3 authorities · 16 participants
    Doosan Infracore Europe SRO
    Representative
    SCP Alain Bénabent (For: Doosan Infracore Europe SRO)
    Acierinox materiel
    Representative
    SARL Ortscheidt (For: Acierinox materiel)
    Sofemat
    Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
    Advocate General
    Mme Cazaux-Charles
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Mme Vignes

    Authorities cited

    3
    • Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012)
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure
      statute
    • French Code of Judicial Organization
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Acierinox materiel v Doosan Infracore Europe SRO and Sofemat (Court of Cassation T 22-15.445) · Matter