Arbitral Digest

Matter

Alexander Brothers Ltd v Alstom Transport SA and Alstom Network UK Ltd

Alexander Brothers Ltd v Alstom Transport SA and Alstom Network UK Ltd

Aliases: Alexander Brothers v Alstom · Alstom v Alexander Brothers

Seat
Switzerland
Applicable rules
ICC Arbitration Rules 2012
Substantive governing law
Swiss law
  1. 29 January 2016Switzerland

    29 January 2016Switzerland

    Final ICC Award in Alexander Brothers Ltd v Alstom Transport SA and Alstom Network UK Ltd dated 29 January 2016

    International Chamber of Commerce

    Decision summary
    The tribunal ordered Alstom Transport SA and Alstom Network UK Ltd to pay EUR 932,800 plus interest under contract 1 and EUR 624,440 plus interest under contract 2. It ordered ABL to pay EUR 77,000 in arbitration costs and EUR 66,281.68 in Alstom legal fees and rejected the remaining claims, including the contract 3 payment claim.

    Supporting details

    2 authorities · 3 participants
    Alexander Brothers Limited
    Alstom Transport SA
    Alstom Network UK Limited
    International Chamber of Commerce

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Swiss Code of Obligations
      statute
    • ICC Arbitration Rules 2012, Arbitration and costs framework
      institutional instrument

    2 months and 1 day later · 61 days

  2. 30 March 2016France

    30 March 2016France

    Order granting recognition and enforcement of the 29 January 2016 award

    Paris Tribunal of First Instance

    Decision summary
    The Paris Tribunal of First Instance granted recognition and enforcement of the Geneva ICC award.

    Supporting details

    1 authority
    Paris Tribunal of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    1
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 1514, 1516 and 1525
      statute

    5 months and 23 days later · 176 days

  3. 22 September 2016France

    22 September 2016France

    Interim order concerning enforcement of the 29 January 2016 award

    Paris Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    RG 16/11182
    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal arranged execution pending appeal and ordered Alstom to consign EUR 1,557,240 with the French Deposit and Consignments Office as judicial sequestrator.

    Supporting details

    1 authority
    Paris Court of Appeal

    Authorities cited

    1
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 1514, 1516, 1520 and 1525
      statute

    1 year, 6 months and 19 days later · 565 days

  4. 10 April 2018France

    10 April 2018France

    Procedural order of the Paris Court of Appeal in RG 16/11182

    Paris Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    RG 16/11182
    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal ordered production of specified documents and invited submissions on whether the evidence indicated a corruption contract.

    Supporting details

    1 authority
    Paris Court of Appeal

    Authorities cited

    1
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1520(5)
      statute

    1 year, 1 month and 18 days later · 413 days

  5. 28 May 2019France

    28 May 2019France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal in RG 16/11182 dated 28 May 2019

    Paris Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    RG 16/11182
    Citation
    RG 16/11182; Portalis 35L7-V-B7A-BY3JK
    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal refused recognition and enforcement of the award, ordered ABL to return EUR 1,828,850.88 to Alstom Transport, and ordered costs. The judgment found serious, precise and consistent indicia that payments financed or remunerated corruption of Chinese public officials.

    Supporting details

    5 authorities
    Paris Court of Appeal

    Authorities cited

    5
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1520(5)
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1525
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 699 and 700
      statute
    • OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 17 December 1997, 17 December 1997
      treaty
    • United Nations Convention against Corruption, Merida, 9 December 2003, 9 December 2003
      treaty

    4 months and 17 days later · 140 days

  6. 15 October 2019United Kingdom

    15 October 2019United Kingdom

    Enforcement order of the High Court of Justice dated 15 October 2019

    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Case no.
    CL-2019-000630
    Decision summary
    The High Court of Justice granted permission to enforce the 29 January 2016 Geneva ICC award in England and Wales.

    Supporting details

    1 authority
    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Arbitration Act 1996 (United Kingdom), Section 103(3)
      statute

    5 months and 22 days later · 174 days

  7. 6 April 2020United Kingdom

    6 April 2020United Kingdom

    Judgment of the High Court of Justice in case CL-2019-000630 dated 6 April 2020

    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Case no.
    CL-2019-000630
    Citation
    [2020] EWHC 814 (Comm)
    Decision summary
    The High Court gave procedural directions on Alstom's applications to adduce French-law expert evidence and extend the evidence timetable in its challenge to the enforcement order.

    Supporting details

    3 authorities
    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Authorities cited

    3
    • Arbitration Act 1996 (United Kingdom), Section 103(3)
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Rules (England and Wales) (Civil Procedure Rules, Part 35 and Rule 35.1, Part 35 and Rule 35.1)
      institutional instrument
    • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 10 June 1958, Article V(2)(b)
      treaty

    2 months and 12 days later · 73 days

  8. 18 June 2020United Kingdom

    18 June 2020United Kingdom

    Judgment of the High Court of Justice in case CL-2019-000630 dated 18 June 2020

    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Case no.
    CL-2019-000630
    Citation
    [2020] EWHC 1584 (Comm)
    Decision summary
    The High Court rejected Alstom's application to set aside the enforcement order for lack of full and frank disclosure and public policy under Section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996.

    Supporting details

    10 authorities
    High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division

    Authorities cited

    10
    • Arbitration Act 1996 (United Kingdom), Sections 103(3), 104 and 105
      statute
    • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 10 June 1958, Article V(2)(b)
      treaty
    • Westacre Investments Inc v Jugoimport-SDPR Holding Co Ltd [2000] QB 288, [2000] QB 288
      case
    • Soleimany v Soleimany [1999] QB 785, [1999] QB 785
      case
    • RBRG Trading (UK) Ltd v Sinocore International Co Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 838, [2018] EWCA Civ 838
      case
    • Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v Benetton International NV, Case C-126/97, EU:C:1999:269, Case C-126/97, EU:C:1999:269
      case
    • Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, (1843) 3 Hare 100
      case
    • Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc (No 1) [1991] 2 AC 93 (HL), [1991] 2 AC 93 (HL)
      case
    • Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2010] UKSC 46
      case
    • Magdeev v Tsvetkov [2020] EWHC 887 (Comm), [2020] EWHC 887 (Comm)
      case

    1 year, 3 months and 11 days later · 468 days

  9. 29 September 2021France

    29 September 2021France

    Judgment of the French Court of Cassation in appeal F 19-19.769 dated 29 September 2021

    French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber

    Case no.
    F 19-19.769
    Citation
    ECLI FR:CCASS:2021:C100558; Decision no. 558 F-D
    Decision summary
    The French Court of Cassation quashed the 28 May 2019 Paris judgment in full and remitted the recognition appeal to the Versailles Court of Appeal. It held that the Paris Court of Appeal had distorted clear terms of the arbitral hearing transcript when assessing the corruption indicia.

    Supporting details

    4 authorities
    French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber

    Authorities cited

    4
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1520(5)
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1014(2)
      statute
    • OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 17 December 1997, 17 December 1997
      treaty
    • United Nations Convention against Corruption, Merida, 9 December 2003, 9 December 2003
      treaty

    1 year, 5 months and 13 days later · 531 days

  10. 14 March 2023France

    14 March 2023France

    Judgment of the Versailles Court of Appeal in RG 21/06191 dated 14 March 2023

    Versailles Court of Appeal, First Chamber, First Section

    Case no.
    RG 21/06191
    Citation
    RG 21/06191
    Decision summary
    The Versailles Court of Appeal, sitting on remand, confirmed the 30 March 2016 recognition and enforcement order, rejected Alstom's public-policy and contradiction objections, and ordered Alstom jointly to pay EUR 30,000 under Article 700 and costs. The court held that the corruption indicia were not sufficiently established.

    Supporting details

    16 authorities
    Versailles Court of Appeal, First Chamber, First Section

    Authorities cited

    16
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 1514 and 1516
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 1520(1), (4), (5) and 1525
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 624, 625 and 638
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 639, 699 and 700
      statute
    • French Law no. 2016-1691 of 9 December 2016 (Sapin II) (French Law no. 2016-1691 of 9 December 2016, Article 17)
      statute
    • OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 17 December 1997, 17 December 1997 and Annex II
      treaty
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 23 November 1976 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 23 November 1976, no. 75-13.113, 23 November 1976)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 4 June 2008 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 4 June 2008, no. 06-15.320, 4 June 2008)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 6 October 2010 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 6 October 2010, no. 09-10.530, 6 October 2010)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 29 June 2011 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 29 June 2011, no. 10-16.680, 29 June 2011)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 12 February 2014 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 12 February 2014, no. 10-17.076, 12 February 2014)
      case
    • Bekolon v Kyrgyz Republic (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 23 March 2022, no. 17-17.981, 23 March 2022)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 7 September 2022 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 7 September 2022, no. 20-22.118, 7 September 2022)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 19 November 1991 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 19 November 1991, no. 89-22.042, 19 November 1991)
      case
    • French Court of Cassation decision of 15 March 1988 (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 15 March 1988, 15 March 1988)
      case
    • Swiss Code of Obligations, Article 18
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Alexander Brothers Ltd v Alstom Transport SA and Alstom Network UK Ltd · Matter