Arbitral Digest

Matter

Amadeaus Investment Limited v Dr Lin Kao Kun (High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance HCA 2379/2015)

  1. 4 October 2016Hong Kong

    4 October 2016Hong Kong

    Order of Master Chow dated 4 October 2016

    High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Decision summary
    Master Chow extended the validity of the writ of summons in Amadeaus Investment Limited's action against Dr Lin Kao Kun.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Amadeaus Investment Limited
    Dr Lin Kao Kun
    High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    2 years and 11 days later · 741 days

  2. 15 October 2018Hong Kong

    15 October 2018Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in the case HCA 2379/2015 dated 15 October 2018

    High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCA 2379/2015
    Citation
    [2018] HKCFI 2343
    Decision summary
    The Court held that Amadeaus Investment Limited showed good reason to extend the validity of the writ in this Category 2 case, where the claim had become time-barred before the extension application. It held that the difficulty of locating and serving Dr Lin Kao Kun justified exercising the discretion to extend the writ, dismissed Dr Lin's application to set aside the renewal order and service and to dismiss the action, and ordered him to pay the application costs subject to summary assessment.

    Supporting details

    14 authorities · 8 participants
    Amadeaus Investment Limited
    Representative
    T Lee (For: Amadeaus Investment Limited)
    Representative
    Howse Williams Bowers (For: Amadeaus Investment Limited)
    Representative
    Withington (For: Amadeaus Investment Limited)
    Dr Lin Kao Kun
    Representative
    M C Law (For: Dr Lin Kao Kun)
    Representative
    ONC Lawyers (For: Dr Lin Kao Kun)
    High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance
    Judge
    K Lo

    Authorities cited

    14
    • Pacific Electric Wire and Cable Co Ltd v Hu Hung Chiu ([2011] 1 HKLRD 1000)
      case-law
    • Kenneth Allison Ltd v A E Limehouse and Co ([1992] 2 AC 105)
      case-law
    • Axa China Region Insurance Co Ltd v Leong Fong Cheng (CACV113/2016)
      case-law
    • Ener-G Holdings Plc v Hormell ([2013] 1 All ER (Comm) 1162)
      case-law
    • Leung Kin Fook v Eastern Worldwide Co Ltd ([1991] 1 HKC 55)
      case-law
    • East Asia Satellite Television Holding Ltd v New Cotai LLC ([2011] 3 HKLRD 134)
      case-law
    • Standard Chartered Bank v Lai Arthur ([1993] 1 HKC 375)
      case-law
    • Tiong King Sing v Sam Boon Peng Yee and another (HCMP1289/2011)
      case-law
    • Deutsche Ruckversicherung AG v Walbrook Insurance Co Ltd ([1995] 1 WLR 1017)
      case-law
    • Secretary for Justice v Chan Yin Bing ([1999] 1 HKC 269)
      case-law
    • Peconic Industrial Development Co Ltd v Chio Ho-cheong ([2000] HKCFI 656)
      case-law
    • Battersby v Anglo American Oil Co Ltd ([1945] KB 23)
      case-law
    • Sealegend Holdings Ltd v China TaiPing Insurance (HK) Co Ltd ([2013] 4 HKLRD 508)
      case-law
    • Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe ([1988] 1 WLR 1350)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Amadeaus Investment Limited v Dr Lin Kao Kun (High Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance HCA 2379/2015) · Matter