Arbitral Digest

Matter

ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD v X CO (Hong Kong High Court HCCT 77/2020 [2022] HKCFI 859)

Case no.
2018 Arbitration
Applicable rules
HKIAC Rules
  1. 12 January 2022Hong Kong

    12 January 2022Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance dated 12 January 2022

    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    Decision summary
    The Court set aside the arbitral award made in the arbitration between ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD and X CO.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD
    X CO
    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    2 months and 12 days later · 71 days

  2. 24 March 2022Hong Kong

    24 March 2022Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance in the case HCCT 77/2020 dated 24 March 2022

    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCCT 77/2020
    Citation
    [2022] HKCFI 859
    Decision summary
    The Court dismissed X CO's application for leave to appeal against its 12 January 2022 decision setting aside the arbitral award. It held that the proposed appeal had no reasonable prospects of success and ordered costs to ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD, with a certificate for two counsel, subject to the order nisi.

    Supporting details

    12 authorities · 9 participants
    ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD
    Representative
    Mr Laurence Li SC (For: ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD)
    Representative
    Mr CHOW Ho Kiu (For: ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD)
    Representative
    CL Chow & Macksion Chan (For: ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD)
    X CO
    Representative
    Mr Victor Joffe QC (For: X CO)
    Representative
    Mr Alexander Tang (For: X CO)
    Representative
    King & Wood Mallesons (For: X CO)
    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    12
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) (Cap 609)
      statute
    • Mimi Kar Yee Wong Hung v Severn Villa Limited (HCMP 2192/2011)
      case law
    • DP World Djibouti FZCO and ors v China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited ([2022] HKCA 84)
      case law
    • Hadmor Productions Ltd v Hamilton ([1983] 1 AC 191)
      case law
    • SPH v SA
      case law
    • Bright Shipping Ltd v Changhong Group (HK) Ltd (No 2) ([2019] 5 HKLRD 30)
      case law
    • The Abidin Daver ([1984] AC 398)
      case law
    • China Construction Bank (Asia) Corp Ltd v Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Co Ltd (CACV 14/2016)
      case law
    • Melvin Waxman v Li Fei Yu (CACV 157/2014)
      case law
    • Lubbe v Cape Plc ([2000] 1 WLR 1545)
      case law
    • The Spiliada
      case law
    • Berezovsky v Michaels ([2000] 1 WLR 1004)
      case law
  3. Date not availableArbitration

    Date not availableArbitration

    Arbitral Award in the 2018 Arbitration

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal ordered delivery of the JV Documents to the CLG.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD
    X CO

Matter record

Report a correction

ARJOWIGGINS HKK2 LTD v X CO (Hong Kong High Court HCCT 77/2020 [2022] HKCFI 859) · Matter