Arbitral Digest

Matter

Arrow Generics v Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited

  1. 14 March 2007France

    14 March 2007France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal, Fourth Chamber Section A, dated 14 March 2007

    Paris Court of Appeal, Fourth Chamber Section A

    Case no.
    06/13425
    Decision summary
    The court annulled the INPI Director's decisions of 26 January 2005 and 3 July 2006 concerning Daiichi Sankyo's supplementary protection certificate 92 CO 224.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited
    Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle
    Teva Classics
    Paris Court of Appeal, Fourth Chamber Section A

    10 years, 7 months and 13 days later · 3880 days

  2. 27 October 2017France

    27 October 2017France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 2, in case 14/03899 dated 27 October 2017

    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 2

    Case no.
    14/03899
    Decision summary
    The court declared Arrow Generiques' third-party opposition to the Paris Court of Appeal's 14 March 2007 judgment admissible and declared Teva Santé's intervention admissible. It partially retracted the 14 March 2007 judgment, holding that the INPI Director's 26 January 2005 decision declaring Daiichi Sankyo's supplementary protection certificate forfeited had been validly notified to Lavoix; the retraction operated against all parties. Daiichi Sankyo was ordered to pay EUR 20,000 to Arrow Generiques and EUR 10,000 to Teva Santé under article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure, plus costs.

    Supporting details

    8 authorities · 25 participants
    Arrow Generiques
    Representative
    Florence GUERRE (For: Arrow Generiques)
    Representative
    SELARL PELLERIN - DE MARIA - GUERRE (For: Arrow Generiques)
    Representative
    Grégoire TRIET (For: Arrow Generiques)
    Representative
    AARPI GIDE - LOYRETTE - NOUEL (For: Arrow Generiques)
    Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle
    Representative
    Laurence TAZE-BERNARD (For: Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle)
    Representative
    Pierre VERON (For: Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle)
    Representative
    Amandine METIER (For: Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle)
    Representative
    SELARL VERON & ASSOCIES (For: Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle)
    Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited
    Representative
    Anne GRAPPOTTE-BENETREAU (For: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited)
    Representative
    SCP GRAPPOTTE-BENETREAU (For: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited)
    Representative
    Pierre HEITZMANN (For: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited)
    Representative
    Claire HABIBI (For: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited)
    Representative
    Partnership JONES DAY (For: Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited)
    Teva Santé
    Representative
    Grégoire DESROUSSEAUX (For: Teva Santé)
    Representative
    SCP AUGUST & DEBOUZY ET ASSOCIÉS (For: Teva Santé)
    Representative
    Charles BOUFFIER (For: Teva Santé)
    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 2
    Advocate General
    Brigitte GARRIGUES
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Carole TREJAUT

    Authorities cited

    8
    • French Code of Civil Procedure
      statute
    • French Decree dated 19 September 1979 (French Decree of 19 September 1979)
      statute
    • French Law of 13 July 1978 modifying and supplementing the law of 2 January 1968
      statute
    • French Law dated 2 January 1968 (French Law of 2 January 1968)
      statute
    • French Decree dated 19 November 1991 (French Decree of 19 November 1991 extending the applicable provisions to supplementary protection certificates)
      statute
    • French Decree dated 5 October 1993 (French Decree of 5 October 1993 modifying article 2)
      statute
    • French Intellectual Property Code
      statute
    • French Court of Cassation judgment dated 25 June 2013 concerning Biogaran (French Court of Cassation Judgment of 25 June 2013 concerning Biogaran's third-party opposition)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Arrow Generics v Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited · Matter