Matter
Agency for Air Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA) v Mr X (French Court of Cassation, nos. 99-16.673 and 98-11.776)
- 17 October 2000France
17 October 2000France
Judgment of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, dated 17 October 2000, no. 98-11.776
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Decision summary
- The Court rejected ASECNA's appeal and upheld the application of French recognition and enforcement rules to the Dakar arbitral sentence, whether characterized as internal or international under Senegalese law. It held that the more favourable French arbitration law applied through the New York Convention and the France–Senegal Convention, so a suspensive appeal in Senegal did not bar exequatur in France.
Supporting details
3 authorities · 2 participantsAgency for Air Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA)
Mr X
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
7 months and 12 days later · 224 days
- 29 May 2001France
29 May 2001France
Judgment of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, dated 29 May 2001, no. 99-16.673
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Decision summary
- The Court rejected ASECNA's appeal concerning its challenge to a conservatory seizure carried out under the Dakar arbitral sentence after exequatur in France. It held that the France–Senegal agreement was not regularly ratified and, in any event, addressed enforcement of judicial decisions rather than arbitral sentences.
Supporting details
4 authorities · 2 participantsAgency for Air Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA)
Mr X
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Date not availableArbitration
Date not availableArbitration
Arbitral sentence rendered in Dakar in favour of Mr X
- Decision summary
- The arbitral sentence rendered in Dakar was in favour of Mr X in the dispute concerning the conditions of his dismissal.
Supporting details
2 participantsAgency for Air Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (ASECNA)
Mr X