Arbitral Digest

Matter

Assmann Telecom v Atis Uher and Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, case K 18-25.611)

Seat
France
Applicable rules
ICC Arbitration Rules
  1. 11 October 2017France

    11 October 2017France

    Judgment of the Paris Commercial Court dated 11 October 2017

    Paris Commercial Court

    Decision summary
    The Paris Commercial Court declared itself competent to hear the dispute involving Assmann Telecom, Atis Uher, and Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos. The Paris Court of Appeal later reversed the jurisdictional ruling as to Assmann Telecom's forced-intervention claim against Atis Uher.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Assmann Telecom
    Atis Uher
    Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos
    Paris Commercial Court

    11 months and 10 days later · 345 days

  2. 21 September 2018France

    21 September 2018France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5, Chamber 11 dated 21 September 2018

    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5, Chamber 11

    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal held the Paris Commercial Court incompetent to hear Assmann Telecom's forced-intervention claim against Atis Uher, applying the arbitration clause in article 8 of the 15 March 2007 concessionaire contract, and invited Assmann Telecom to pursue the claim before the appropriate forum.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Assmann Telecom
    Atis Uher
    Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos
    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5, Chamber 11

    1 year, 4 months and 22 days later · 509 days

  3. 12 February 2020France

    12 February 2020France

    Decision of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber in the case K 18-25.611 dated 12 February 2020

    French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber

    Case no.
    K 18-25.611
    Citation
    Decision No. 10099 F
    Decision summary
    The French Court of Cassation rejected Assmann Telecom's principal appeal against the Paris Court of Appeal's decision that the Paris Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction over Assmann Telecom's forced-intervention claim against Atis Uher because the claim fell within the arbitration clause in the 15 March 2007 concessionaire contract. Assmann Telecom was ordered to pay the costs and EUR 3,000 to Atis Uher under article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure.

    Supporting details

    1 authority · 9 participants
    Assmann Telecom
    Representative
    SCP Waquet, Farge et Hazan (For: Assmann Telecom)
    Atis Uher
    Representative
    SCP Ohl et Vexliard (For: Atis Uher)
    Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos
    French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Mme Berthomier

    Authorities cited

    1
    • French Code of Civil Procedure
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Assmann Telecom v Atis Uher and Telecom Externals Operating Systems - Telecom exos (French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, case K 18-25.611) · Matter