Matter
Assystem v C & K Coactive and others (French Court of Cassation 13-17.402)
- 6 March 2013France
6 March 2013France
Judgment of the Toulouse Court of Appeal dated 6 March 2013
Toulouse Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The Toulouse Court of Appeal held that the arbitration clause in the distribution contract covered the dispute concerning defective electronic components and that the state court therefore lacked jurisdiction in favor of the arbitral jurisdiction.
Supporting details
11 participantsAssystem
ITT Corporation
C & K Components Inc
C & K Coactive
C & K Components France
Deltron UK
Deltron France
Yelloz Components
Axa
Avnet EMG
Avnet Logistics Ltd
Toulouse Court of Appeal
1 year, 4 months and 3 days later · 490 days
- 9 July 2014France
9 July 2014France
Judgment of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, in case 13-17.402 dated 9 July 2014
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Decision summary
- The Court of Cassation rejected Assystem's appeal and upheld the state court's lack of jurisdiction in favor of arbitration. It held that the arbitration clause in the 8 June 2000 distribution contract was not manifestly inapplicable to the dispute over defective electronic components and was transmitted as an accessory through the chain of contracts transferring ownership; a jurisdiction clause in another contract did not displace arbitral jurisdiction. Assystem was ordered to pay costs and specified sums under Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure.
Supporting details
4 authorities · 13 participantsAssystem
- Representative
- SCP Waquet, Farge et Hazan (For: Assystem)
ITT Corporation
C & K Components Inc
C & K Coactive
C & K Components France
C & K Components SAS
Deltron UK
Deltron France
Yelloz Components
Axa
Avnet EMG
Avnet Logistics Ltd
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber