Arbitral Digest

Matter

Astro Nusantara International B.V. and Others v PT First Media Tbk (Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal FACV No. 14 of 2017)

Seat
Singapore
Applicable rules
2007 SIAC Rules
  1. 7 May 2009Singapore

    7 May 2009Singapore

    Award on Preliminary Issues dated 7 May 2009

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The tribunal ruled that rule 24(b) of the 2007 SIAC Rules empowered it to join persons who were not already parties to the arbitration agreement.

    Supporting details

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    4 months and 26 days later · 149 days

  2. 3 October 2009Singapore

    3 October 2009Singapore

    Further Partial Award dated 3 October 2009

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Supporting details

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    4 months and 2 days later · 125 days

  3. 5 February 2010Singapore

    5 February 2010Singapore

    Award on Costs for the Preliminary Issues dated 5 February 2010

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Supporting details

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    11 days later · 11 days

  4. 16 February 2010Singapore

    16 February 2010Singapore

    Interim Final Award dated 16 February 2010

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The tribunal rendered an Interim Final Award in favour of Astro in a sum exceeding US$130 million.

    Supporting details

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    5 months and 18 days later · 168 days

  5. 3 August 2010Singapore

    3 August 2010Singapore

    Final Award – Interests and Costs dated 3 August 2010

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre

    Supporting details

    Singapore International Arbitration Centre
  6. 3 August 2010Hong Kong

    3 August 2010Hong Kong

    Order of Saunders J dated 3 August 2010

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Saunders J granted Astro leave to enforce the tribunal's awards in Hong Kong against the Lippo parties.

    1 month and 6 days later · 37 days

  7. 9 September 2010Hong Kong

    9 September 2010Hong Kong

    Order of Saunders J granting leave to enforce the awards dated 9 September 2010

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Saunders J granted Astro leave to enforce the tribunal's awards in Hong Kong against the Lippo parties.

    3 months later · 91 days

  8. 9 December 2010Hong Kong

    9 December 2010Hong Kong

    Judgment of Saunders J dated 9 December 2010

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Saunders J entered judgment against the Lippo parties in terms of the awards.

    7 months and 13 days later · 225 days

  9. 22 July 2011Hong Kong

    22 July 2011Hong Kong

    Garnishee order nisi dated 22 July 2011

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    The court made a garnishee order nisi attaching a debt of US$44 million due from AcrossAsia Limited to PT First Media Tbk.

    2 years, 3 months and 9 days later · 832 days

  10. 31 October 2013Hong Kong

    31 October 2013Hong Kong

    Judgment of Deputy High Court Judge Mayo dated 31 October 2013

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Deputy High Court Judge Mayo directed that the garnishee order be made absolute.
  11. 31 October 2013Singapore

    31 October 2013Singapore

    Judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal in PT First Media Tbk v Astro Nusantara International B.V. and others [2013] SGCA 57 dated 31 October 2013

    Singapore Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    [2013] SGCA 57
    Citation
    [2013] SGCA 57
    Decision summary
    The Singapore Court of Appeal held that rule 24(b) of the 2007 SIAC Rules did not empower the tribunal to join the Additional Parties because they were not parties to the Subscription and Shareholders' Agreement, and that the tribunal therefore lacked jurisdiction to make awards in their favour against PT First Media Tbk; Singapore enforcement orders in their favour were set aside.

    2 months and 24 days later · 85 days

  12. 24 January 2014Hong Kong

    24 January 2014Hong Kong

    Order of Mimmie Chan J dated 24 January 2014

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Mimmie Chan J unconditionally stayed execution of the garnishee order absolute pending determination of PT First Media Tbk's setting-aside application.

    5 months and 1 day later · 152 days

  13. 25 June 2014Hong Kong

    25 June 2014Hong Kong

    Order refusing leave to appeal dated 25 June 2014

    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal refused Astro leave to appeal against Mimmie Chan J's unconditional stay order.

    7 months and 23 days later · 237 days

  14. 17 February 2015Hong Kong

    17 February 2015Hong Kong

    Judgment of Chow J dated 17 February 2015

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    Chow J upheld the enforcement orders and judgment and refused PT First Media Tbk leave to apply out of time to set them aside on the ground that the awards were made without jurisdiction.

    6 months and 16 days later · 197 days

  15. 2 September 2015Hong Kong

    2 September 2015Hong Kong

    Decision of the Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong in CACV 251/2013, CACV 253/2013 and CACV 66/2015 dated 2 September 2015

    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong

    Case no.
    CACV 251/2013; CACV 253/2013; CACV 66/2015
    Decision summary
    The Court directed that AcrossAsia Limited's appeal concerning the garnishee order be dealt with after disposal of First Media's setting-aside appeal or until further order, and ordered the costs of the directions hearing in the cause of the respective appeals.

    Supporting details

    1 authority · 4 participants
    Astro Nusantara International B.V.
    PT First Media Tbk
    AcrossAsia Limited
    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong
    Judge
    Lai

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
      statute

    3 months and 6 days later · 97 days

  16. 8 December 2015Hong Kong

    8 December 2015Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong in HCCT 45/2010 dated 8 December 2015

    High Court of Hong Kong

    Case no.
    HCCT 45/2010
    Decision summary
    The court granted leave to appeal on the stated question, stayed execution in the related First Media and AcrossAsia appeals, and varied the costs order nisi so that First Media was to pay 80% of Astro's costs of the summons.

    Supporting details

    1 authority · 3 participants
    Astro Nusantara International B.V.
    PT First Media Tbk
    High Court of Hong Kong

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
      statute

    11 months and 27 days later · 363 days

  17. 5 December 2016Hong Kong

    5 December 2016Hong Kong

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal in CACV 272/2015 dated 5 December 2016

    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong

    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal held that the enforcement court should have taken account of the fundamental defect that the awards were made without jurisdiction, but upheld Chow J's refusal to extend time and dismissed the appeal.
  18. 5 December 2016Hong Kong

    5 December 2016Hong Kong

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong in CACV 272/2015 dated 5 December 2016

    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong

    Case no.
    CACV 272/2015
    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal held that the fundamental defect in the awards, made without jurisdiction against parties wrongly joined to the arbitration, required refusal of enforcement in the exercise of the section 44(2) discretion. It nevertheless dismissed First Media's appeal and upheld the refusal to extend time to apply to set aside the Hong Kong enforcement orders and judgment.

    Supporting details

    7 authorities
    Court of Appeal of the High Court of Hong Kong

    Authorities cited

    7
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 341; transitional provisions under Cap 609)
      statute
    • Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
      statute
    • Dardana Ltd v Yukos Oil Company
      case-law
    • Rainstorm Pictures Inc v Lombard-Knight ([2014] Bus L R 1196)
      case-law
    • Hebei Import & Export Corp v Polytek Engineering Co Ltd ((1999) 2 HKCFAR 111)
      case-law
    • Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan ([2011] 1 AC 763)
      case-law
    • Terna Bahrain Holding Company WLL v Al Shamsi ([2013] 1 Lloyd's Rep 86)
      case-law

    1 year, 4 months and 6 days later · 492 days

  19. 11 April 2018Hong Kong

    11 April 2018Hong Kong

    Judgment of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in FACV No. 14 of 2017 dated 11 April 2018

    Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    Case no.
    FACV No. 14 of 2017 (Civil)
    Citation
    [2018] HKCFA 12
    Decision summary
    The Court unanimously allowed First Media's appeal, set aside the decisions below, and extended by three months the time for First Media to apply for leave to set aside the Hong Kong enforcement orders and the judgment entered on them. It held that the fundamental absence of a valid arbitration agreement and the tribunal's lack of jurisdiction required refusal of enforcement in the exercise of the court's discretion.

    Supporting details

    19 authorities · 7 participants
    Astro Nusantara International B.V.
    PT First Media Tbk
    Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

    Authorities cited

    19
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 341; transitional provisions under Cap 609)
      statute
    • Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
      statute
    • Singapore International Arbitration Act (International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A))
      statute
    • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958 New York Convention)
      treaty
    • Hebei Import & Export Corp v Polytek Engineering Co Ltd ((1999) 2 HKCFAR 111)
      case-law
    • China Nanhai Oil Joint Service Corp Shenzhen Branch v Gee Tai Holdings Co Ltd ([1995] 2 HKLR 215)
      case-law
    • Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan ([2011] 1 AC 763)
      case-law
    • First Laser Ltd v Fujian Enterprises (Holdings) Co Ltd ((2012) 15 HKCFAR 569)
      case-law
    • The Sennar (No 2) ([1985] 1 WLR 490)
      case-law
    • Terna Bahrain Holding Company WLL v Al Shamsi ([2013] 1 Lloyd's Rep 86)
      case-law
    • The Decurion ([2012] 1 HKLRD 1063)
      case-law
    • Costellow v Somerset County Council ([1993] 1 WLR 256)
      case-law
    • Denton v TH White Ltd ([2014] 1 WLR 3926)
      case-law
    • Wing Fai Construction Co Ltd v Yip Kwong Robert ((2011) 14 HKCFAR 935)
      case-law
    • Paklito Investment Ltd v Klockner East Asia Ltd ([1993] 2 HKLR 39)
      case-law
    • Minmetals Germany GmbH v Ferco Steel Ltd ([1999] CLC 647)
      case-law
    • Gao Haiyan v Keeneye Holdings ([2012] 1 HKLRD 627)
      case-law
    • Societe Nationale D'Operations Petrolieres de la Cote d'Ivoire Holding v Keen Lloyd Resources Ltd ([2004] 3 HKC 452)
      case-law
    • Michael Jonathan Christopher Oldham v QBE Insurance (Europe) Ltd ([2017] EWHC 3045 (Comm))
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Astro Nusantara International B.V. and Others v PT First Media Tbk (Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal FACV No. 14 of 2017) · Matter