Arbitral Digest

Matter

Automatique Distribution: Audis v Geile Warenautomaten GmbH (ICC Arbitration No. 3334)

Case no.
3334
Applicable rules
ICC Arbitration Rules
  1. 28 April 2023Arbitration

    28 April 2023Arbitration

    Procedural Order No. 2 of 28 April 2023

    International Chamber of Commerce

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal dismissed Geile Warenautomaten GmbH's procedural motions, ordered it to produce certified records of its uncapped pre-dosed cup orders and paper-cup purchases for 2019–2022 and its settlement agreement with Lavazza, and reserved costs until the final award.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Automatique Distribution: Audis
    Geile Warenautomaten GmbH
    International Chamber of Commerce

    8 months and 21 days later · 265 days

  2. 18 January 2024Arbitration

    18 January 2024Arbitration

    Final arbitral award of 18 January 2024

    International Chamber of Commerce

    Award no.
    3334
    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal declared Audis's claims admissible and ordered Geile Warenautomaten GmbH to pay Audis various sums totalling EUR 6,845,019.48.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Automatique Distribution: Audis
    Geile Warenautomaten GmbH
    International Chamber of Commerce

    4 months and 17 days later · 138 days

  3. 4 June 2024France

    4 June 2024France

    Incident Order of the Paris Court of Appeal in case RG 23/09465 dated 4 June 2024

    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16

    Case no.
    RG 23/09465
    Decision summary
    The court held that Procedural Order No. 2 did not finally determine the dispute and was therefore not an arbitral award open to annulment. It declared Geile Warenautomaten GmbH's annulment challenge inadmissible, ordered Geile to pay EUR 5,000 to Audis and SELARL Perspectives, and ordered it to pay the costs.

    Supporting details

    6 authorities · 11 participants
    Automatique Distribution: Audis
    Representative
    Matthieu Boccon Gibod (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Philippe Lauzeral (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Valentin Besnard (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    SELARL Perspectives
    Representative
    Matthieu Boccon Gibod (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Philippe Lauzeral (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Valentin Besnard (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires
    Representative
    Matthieu Boccon Gibod (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Philippe Lauzeral (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Representative
    Valentin Besnard (For: Automatique Distribution: Audis · SELARL Perspectives · SELARL BMA Administrateurs Judiciaires)
    Geile Warenautomaten GmbH
    Representative
    Frédérique Etevenard (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    Representative
    Axelle Zenati (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Najma El Farissi

    Authorities cited

    6
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 914
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1527
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 908 and 911
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 1506, 1466 and 1520(1)
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 122, 30, 32, 367, 368, 378, 699 and 700
      statute
    • French Commercial Code, Article L. 631-14
      statute

    7 months and 12 days later · 226 days

  4. 16 January 2025France

    16 January 2025France

    Incident Order of the Paris Court of Appeal in case RG 24/02660 dated 16 January 2025

    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16

    Case no.
    RG 24/02660
    Decision summary
    The court rejected SELARL Perspectives's incident challenging the form of Geile Warenautomaten GmbH's annulment challenge, declared the challenge to the 18 January 2024 arbitral award admissible, left each party responsible for its incident costs, rejected both Article 700 requests, and remitted the matter for case-management scheduling.

    Supporting details

    4 authorities · 9 participants
    SELARL Perspectives
    Representative
    Matthieu Boccon Gibod (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Representative
    Philippe Lauzeral (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Representative
    Valentin Besnard (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Geile Warenautomaten GmbH
    Representative
    Frédérique Etevenard (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    Representative
    Axelle Zenati (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Najma El Farissi

    Authorities cited

    4
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1518
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 1527
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 122
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 700
      statute

    9 months and 14 days later · 287 days

  5. 30 October 2025France

    30 October 2025France

    Withdrawal Order of the Paris Court of Appeal in case RG 24/02660 dated 30 October 2025

    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16

    Case no.
    RG 24/02660
    Decision summary
    The court recorded Geile Warenautomaten GmbH's unconditional withdrawal of its annulment challenge to the 18 January 2024 award and SELARL Perspectives's acceptance. It declared the withdrawal effective, recorded extinction of the proceedings and action and the court's withdrawal from the case, and left each party responsible for its own costs under their agreement.

    Supporting details

    4 authorities · 9 participants
    Geile Warenautomaten GmbH
    Representative
    Frédérique Etevenard (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    Representative
    Axelle Zenati (For: Geile Warenautomaten GmbH)
    SELARL Perspectives
    Representative
    Matthieu Boccon Gibod (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Representative
    Philippe Lauzeral (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Representative
    Valentin Besnard (For: SELARL Perspectives)
    Paris Court of Appeal, Pôle 5, Chambre 16
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Najma El Farissi

    Authorities cited

    4
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 384
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 394 et seq.
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 385 and 395
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Articles 400 and 401
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Automatique Distribution: Audis v Geile Warenautomaten GmbH (ICC Arbitration No. 3334) · Matter