Arbitral Digest

Matter

AW and Others v PY and Another (High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance, HCCT 47/2021, [2022] HKCFI 1397)

Case no.
HKIAC xxxxx
  1. 13 March 2020Arbitration

    13 March 2020Arbitration

    Partial Final Award in Arbitration 1 dated 13 March 2020

    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The tribunal dismissed the AW Group's counterclaim for misrepresentation and ordered specific performance in favour of PY and W.

    Supporting details

    8 participants
    PY
    W
    AW
    AW BJ
    AW BJT
    G
    WX
    PT
    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    1 month and 17 days later · 48 days

  2. 30 April 2020Arbitration

    30 April 2020Arbitration

    Correction and Interpretation Award in Arbitration 1 dated 30 April 2020

    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    Supporting details

    8 participants
    PY
    W
    AW
    AW BJ
    AW BJT
    G
    WX
    PT
    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    11 months and 14 days later · 348 days

  3. 13 April 2021Arbitration

    13 April 2021Arbitration

    Final Award on Costs in Arbitration 1 dated 13 April 2021

    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    Decision summary
    The tribunal awarded costs to PY and W as the successful parties in Arbitration 1.

    Supporting details

    8 participants
    PY
    W
    AW
    AW BJ
    AW BJT
    G
    WX
    PT
    Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre

    1 year and 1 month later · 395 days

  4. 13 May 2022Hong Kong

    13 May 2022Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in the case HCCT 47/2021 dated 13 May 2022

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Decision summary
    The Court dismissed AW Group's Originating Summons application to set aside the Partial Final Award in Arbitration 1, the Correction and Interpretation Award, and the Final Award on Costs. It held that the time for applying to set aside Award 1 could not be extended under Article 34(3) of the Model Law and, in any event, AW Group had not shown good reason for an extension. AW Group were ordered to pay PY and W the costs of the application on an indemnity basis, with a Certificate for 2 Counsel.

    Supporting details

    24 authorities · 9 participants
    AW
    AW BJ
    AW BJT
    G
    WX
    PT
    PY
    W
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    24
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609) (Cap 609)
      statute
    • Hong Kong Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) (Cap 4A)
      statute
    • Hong Kong Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance (Cap 1) (Cap 1)
      statute
    • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
      statute
    • Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara ([2009] 12 HKCFAR 84)
      case law
    • Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd v Pacific China Holdings Ltd ([2012] 4 HKLRD 1)
      case law
    • Mayer Corporation Development Intl Ltd v Alliance Financial Intelligence Ltd and Others ([2019] HKCA 777)
      case law
    • Takhar v Gracefield
      case law
    • Nigeria v Process & Industrial ([2021] 1 Lloyd's Rep 121)
      case law
    • Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley ([1956] 1 QB 702)
      case law
    • Astro Nusantara International BV v PT Ayunda Prima Mitra ((2018) 21 HKCFAR 118)
      case law
    • The Decurion ([2012] 1 HKLRD 1063)
      case law
    • Costellow v Somerset County Council ([1993] 1 WLR 256)
      case law
    • Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc & Anor v Global Gaming Philippines LLC & Anor ([2021] 1 SLR 1045)
      case law
    • American International Group, Inc and anor v X Company (HCCT 60/2015)
      case law
    • Bangkok Capital Antique Co Ltd v the Collector of Stamp Revenue ([1984] HKC 16)
      case law
    • Suen Hung Shan v Commissioner of Inland Revenue ([2021] 1 HKLRD 175)
      case law
    • Sun Tian Gang v Hong Kong China Gas (Jilin) Ltd ([2016] 5 HKLRD 221)
      case law
    • Nina Kung v Wong Din Shin ((2005) 8 HKCFAR 387)
      case law
    • Ladd v Marshall
      case law
    • A Solicitor v The Law Society of Hong Kong ([1966] 1 HKLR 260)
      case law
    • BVU v BVX ([2019] SGHC 69)
      case law
    • W v AW ([2021] HKCFI 1701)
      case law
    • Terna Bahrain Holding Co WLL v Al Shamsi
      case law

Matter record

Report a correction

AW and Others v PY and Another (High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance, HCCT 47/2021, [2022] HKCFI 1397) · Matter