Arbitral Digest

Matter

B. KG v R. S. (Supreme Court of Poland I CSK 464/16)

  1. 14 December 2006Arbitration

    14 December 2006Arbitration

    Ad hoc arbitral award of 14 December 2006

    Decision summary
    The ad hoc arbitral tribunal ordered B. KG to pay R. S. EUR 105,563.83, with interest and arbitration costs, for remuneration for November and December 2004 and the 2004 annual bonus. The award was later set aside in part by the Regional Court in W.

    Supporting details

    5 participants
    R. S.
    B. KG
    Institution
    Arbitrator
    J. K.
    Arbitrator
    Z. B.
    Arbitrator
    J. B.

    1 year, 2 months and 21 days later · 448 days

  2. 6 March 2008Poland

    6 March 2008Poland

    Judgment of the Regional Court in W. dated 6 March 2008

    Regional Court in W., Poland

    Decision summary
    The Regional Court in W. set aside the 14 December 2006 ad hoc arbitral award in the part ordering payment to R. S. because B. KG was not effectively notified of the arbitration and was deprived of the opportunity to defend its rights.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    B. KG
    R. S.
    Regional Court in W., Poland

    4 years, 8 months and 15 days later · 1721 days

  3. 21 November 2012Arbitration

    21 November 2012Arbitration

    Ad hoc arbitral award of 21 November 2012

    Decision summary
    After the tribunal was reconstituted and the arbitration proceeded with B. KG's participation, the tribunal ordered B. KG to pay R. S. EUR 104,963.83 with statutory interest as the principal claim and PLN 23,500 as reimbursement of proceedings costs. The award was set aside in the challenged scope by the Regional Court in W. and the Court of Appeal later dismissed the setting-aside application.

    Supporting details

    5 participants
    R. S.
    B. KG
    Institution
    Arbitrator
    M. Ł.
    Arbitrator
    M. R.
    Arbitrator
    P. K.

    2 years and 21 days later · 751 days

  4. 12 December 2014Poland

    12 December 2014Poland

    Judgment of the Regional Court in W. dated 12 December 2014

    Regional Court in W., Poland

    Decision summary
    The Regional Court in W. set aside the 21 November 2012 ad hoc arbitral award in the challenged scope, holding that the tribunal's three-member composition did not comply with the applicable appointment arrangement and that the award conflicted with fundamental principles of the Polish legal order.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    B. KG
    R. S.
    Regional Court in W., Poland

    1 year and 4 days later · 369 days

  5. 16 December 2015Poland

    16 December 2015Poland

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal in (…) dated 16 December 2015

    Court of Appeal in (…), Poland

    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal amended the Regional Court's judgment and dismissed B. KG's application to set aside the 21 November 2012 ad hoc arbitral award.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    B. KG
    R. S.
    Court of Appeal in (…), Poland

    1 year, 5 months and 10 days later · 527 days

  6. 26 May 2017Poland

    26 May 2017Poland

    Judgment of the Supreme Court of Poland in case I CSK 464/16 dated 26 May 2017

    Supreme Court of Poland

    Case no.
    I CSK 464/16
    Citation
    I CSK 464/16
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court dismissed B. KG's cassation appeal against the Court of Appeal judgment concerning the setting aside of the 21 November 2012 ad hoc arbitral award and ordered B. KG to pay R. S. PLN 1,800 in cassation-proceeding costs. It held that the Court of Appeal correctly rejected the challenges concerning tribunal composition, the binding effect of the 2008 judgment, and limitation of the underlying claim.

    Supporting details

    27 authorities · 6 participants
    B. KG
    R. S.
    Supreme Court of Poland
    Other
    Court Reporter
    Ewa Krentzel

    Authorities cited

    27
    • Polish Code of Civil Procedure (k.p.c.)
      statute
    • Polish Civil Code (k.c.)
      statute
    • Act of 10 September 2015 amending certain acts to support amicable methods of dispute resolution (Dz. U. poz. 1595)
      statute
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (III CSK 161/10)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (V CSK 164/16)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court resolution (III CZP 95/03)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court resolution (III CZP 17/15)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (V CSK 203/13)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (C.III. 313/33)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (C. II. 2507/36)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (C.III. 511/35)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (II CR 287/71)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (IV CKN 1073/00)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CK 217/05)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 86/13)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 494/11)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (IV CSK 181/14)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (III CNP 29/15)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 416/11)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (IV CSK 187/13)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (V CSK 321/06)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 192/07)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (II CSK 557/13)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 53/09)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 312/11)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CR 663/73)
      case
    • Polish Supreme Court judgment (I CSK 769/12)
      case

Matter record

Report a correction

B. KG v R. S. (Supreme Court of Poland I CSK 464/16) · Matter