Arbitral Digest

Matter

Belaruskali AAT, Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union

  1. 18 September 2024European Union

    18 September 2024European Union

    Belarusian Potash Company v Council (T-534/22, EU:T:2024:632) dated 18 September 2024

    General Court of the European Union

    Case no.
    T-534/22
    Citation
    EU:T:2024:632
    Decision summary
    The General Court dismissed Belarusian Potash Company's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing it.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Belarusian Potash Company AAT
    Council of the European Union
    General Court of the European Union
  2. 18 September 2024European Union

    18 September 2024European Union

    Belaruskali v Council (T-528/22, EU:T:2024:633) dated 18 September 2024

    General Court of the European Union

    Case no.
    T-528/22
    Citation
    EU:T:2024:633
    Decision summary
    The General Court dismissed Belaruskali's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing it.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Belaruskali AAT
    Council of the European Union
    Kingdom of Belgium
    General Court of the European Union
  3. 18 September 2024European Union

    18 September 2024European Union

    Golovaty v Council (T-521/22, EU:T:2024:631) dated 18 September 2024

    General Court of the European Union

    Case no.
    T-521/22
    Citation
    EU:T:2024:631
    Decision summary
    The General Court dismissed Ivan Golovaty's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing him.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty
    Council of the European Union
    General Court of the European Union

    1 year and 9 months later · 638 days

  4. 18 June 2026European Union

    18 June 2026European Union

    Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-816/24 P, C-817/24 P and C-818/24 P dated 18 June 2026

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    Case no.
    C-816/24 P, C-817/24 P and C-818/24 P
    Decision summary
    The Court joined the three appeals, dismissed them, and ordered Belaruskali AAT, Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT to bear their own costs and pay the Council of the European Union's costs; the Republic of Lithuania was ordered to bear its own costs.

    Supporting details

    28 authorities · 23 participants
    Belaruskali AAT
    Representative
    E. Anevlavi (For: Belaruskali AAT · Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty)
    Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty
    Representative
    E. Anevlavi (For: Belaruskali AAT · Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty)
    Belarusian Potash Company AAT
    Representative
    C. Cauvin (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)
    Representative
    B. Evtimov (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)
    Representative
    V. Ostrovskis (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)
    Council of the European Union
    Representative
    A. Boggio-Tomasaz (For: Council of the European Union)
    Representative
    B. Driessen (For: Council of the European Union)
    Representative
    J. Rurarz (For: Council of the European Union)
    Republic of Lithuania
    Representative
    K. Dieninis (For: Republic of Lithuania)
    Representative
    V. Kazlauskaite-Svencioniene (For: Republic of Lithuania)
    Kingdom of Belgium
    Representative
    C. Pochet (For: Kingdom of Belgium)
    Representative
    M. Van Regemorter (For: Kingdom of Belgium)
    Republic of Latvia
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Advocate General
    J. Kokott
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    A. Calot Escobar

    Authorities cited

    28
    • Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
      statute
    • Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
      statute
    • Rules of Procedure of the General Court
      statute
    • Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (Regulation (EC) No 765/2006)
      statute
    • Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (Decision 2012/642/CFSP)
      statute
    • Council Regulation (EU) No 588/2011 (Regulation (EU) No 588/2011)
      statute
    • Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP (Decision 2010/639/CFSP)
      statute
    • Council Decision 2012/36/CFSP (Decision 2012/36/CFSP)
      statute
    • Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1031 (Decision (CFSP) 2021/1031)
      statute
    • Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 (Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881)
      statute
    • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876)
      statute
    • Council Decision 2023/421 (Decision 2023/421)
      statute
    • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419)
      statute
    • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
      statute
    • PU v EPPO (C-352/24 P, EU:C:2025:892)
      case-law
    • Commission v Missir Mamachi di Lusignano (C-54/20 P, EU:C:2022:349)
      case-law
    • DD v FRA (C-680/22 P, EU:C:2024:1019)
      case-law
    • Lithuania and Others v Parliament and Council (Mobility package) (C-541/20 to C-555/20, EU:C:2024:818)
      case-law
    • Timchenko v Council (C-703/23 P, EU:C:2025:608)
      case-law
    • Irish Ferries (C-570/19, EU:C:2021:664)
      case-law
    • Bank Tejarat v Council (C-248/17 P, EU:C:2018:967)
      case-law
    • Spain v Commission (C-588/17 P, EU:C:2018:607)
      case-law
    • Timchenko v Council (C-702/23 P, EU:C:2025:605)
      case-law
    • Nordic Info (C-128/22, EU:C:2023:951)
      case-law
    • VTB Bank v Council (C-729/18 P, EU:C:2020:499)
      case-law
    • ISD Polska and Others v Commission (C-369/09 P, EU:C:2011:175)
      case-law
    • Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council (C-326/24 P, EU:C:2025:522)
      case-law
    • Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Belaruskali AAT, Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union · Matter