Belaruskali AAT, Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT v Council of the European Union

Procedural record

1. 18 September 2024European Union

   18 September 2024European Union

   Belarusian Potash Company v Council (T-534/22, EU:T:2024:632) dated 18 September 2024

   General Court of the European Union

   Case no.

   T-534/22

   Citation

   EU:T:2024:632

   Decision summary

   The General Court dismissed Belarusian Potash Company's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing it.

   Participants

   Belarusian Potash Company AAT

   Council of the European Union

   General Court of the European Union

2. 18 September 2024European Union

   18 September 2024European Union

   Belaruskali v Council (T-528/22, EU:T:2024:633) dated 18 September 2024

   General Court of the European Union

   Case no.

   T-528/22

   Citation

   EU:T:2024:633

   Decision summary

   The General Court dismissed Belaruskali's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing it.

   Participants

   Belaruskali AAT

   Council of the European Union

   Kingdom of Belgium

   General Court of the European Union

3. 18 September 2024European Union

   18 September 2024European Union

   Golovaty v Council (T-521/22, EU:T:2024:631) dated 18 September 2024

   General Court of the European Union

   Case no.

   T-521/22

   Citation

   EU:T:2024:631

   Decision summary

   The General Court dismissed Ivan Golovaty's action seeking annulment of the EU restrictive measures listing him.

   Participants

   Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty

   Council of the European Union

   General Court of the European Union

   1 year and 9 months later · 638 days

4. 18 June 2026European Union

   18 June 2026European Union

   Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-816/24 P, C-817/24 P and C-818/24 P dated 18 June 2026

   Court of Justice of the European Union

   Case no.

   C-816/24 P, C-817/24 P and C-818/24 P

   Text

   Decision summary

   The Court joined the three appeals, dismissed them, and ordered Belaruskali AAT, Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT to bear their own costs and pay the Council of the European Union's costs; the Republic of Lithuania was ordered to bear its own costs.

   Participants

   Belaruskali AAT

   Representative

   E. Anevlavi (For: Belaruskali AAT · Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty)

   Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty

   Representative

   E. Anevlavi (For: Belaruskali AAT · Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty)

   Belarusian Potash Company AAT

   Representative

   C. Cauvin (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)

   Representative

   B. Evtimov (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)

   Representative

   V. Ostrovskis (For: Belarusian Potash Company AAT)

   Council of the European Union

   Representative

   A. Boggio-Tomasaz (For: Council of the European Union)

   Representative

   B. Driessen (For: Council of the European Union)

   Representative

   J. Rurarz (For: Council of the European Union)

   Republic of Lithuania

   Representative

   K. Dieninis (For: Republic of Lithuania)

   Representative

   V. Kazlauskaite-Svencioniene (For: Republic of Lithuania)

   Kingdom of Belgium

   Representative

   C. Pochet (For: Kingdom of Belgium)

   Representative

   M. Van Regemorter (For: Kingdom of Belgium)

   Republic of Latvia

   Court of Justice of the European Union

   Judge

   J. Passer

   Judge

   E. Regan

   Judge

   B. Smulders

   Advocate General

   J. Kokott

   Other

   Institutional administrator

   A. Calot Escobar

   Authorities cited

   28

   • Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
     statute
   • Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
     statute
   • Rules of Procedure of the General Court
     statute
   • Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (Regulation (EC) No 765/2006)
     statute
   • Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (Decision 2012/642/CFSP)
     statute
   • Council Regulation (EU) No 588/2011 (Regulation (EU) No 588/2011)
     statute
   • Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP (Decision 2010/639/CFSP)
     statute
   • Council Decision 2012/36/CFSP (Decision 2012/36/CFSP)
     statute
   • Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1031 (Decision (CFSP) 2021/1031)
     statute
   • Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881 (Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/881)
     statute
   • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/876)
     statute
   • Council Decision 2023/421 (Decision 2023/421)
     statute
   • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 (Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419)
     statute
   • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
     statute
   • PU v EPPO (C-352/24 P, EU:C:2025:892)
     case-law
   • Commission v Missir Mamachi di Lusignano (C-54/20 P, EU:C:2022:349)
     case-law
   • DD v FRA (C-680/22 P, EU:C:2024:1019)
     case-law
   • Lithuania and Others v Parliament and Council (Mobility package) (C-541/20 to C-555/20, EU:C:2024:818)
     case-law
   • Timchenko v Council (C-703/23 P, EU:C:2025:608)
     case-law
   • Irish Ferries (C-570/19, EU:C:2021:664)
     case-law
   • Bank Tejarat v Council (C-248/17 P, EU:C:2018:967)
     case-law
   • Spain v Commission (C-588/17 P, EU:C:2018:607)
     case-law
   • Timchenko v Council (C-702/23 P, EU:C:2025:605)
     case-law
   • Nordic Info (C-128/22, EU:C:2023:951)
     case-law
   • VTB Bank v Council (C-729/18 P, EU:C:2020:499)
     case-law
   • ISD Polska and Others v Commission (C-369/09 P, EU:C:2011:175)
     case-law
   • Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council (C-326/24 P, EU:C:2025:522)
     case-law
   • Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245)
     case-law