Arbitral Digest

Matter

Belaya ptitsa-Kursk v Robot Grader AB (Swedish Supreme Court decision of 4 May 2018)

Applicable rules
ICAC procedural rules
  1. 25 March 2016Arbitration

    25 March 2016Arbitration

    ICAC final arbitral award of 25 March 2016

    International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

    Decision summary
    The award ordered Robot Grader AB to pay Belaya ptitsa-Kursk EUR 324,000 and compensation for the arbitration fee.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Belaya ptitsa-Kursk
    Robot Grader AB
    International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

    1 year, 2 months and 28 days later · 454 days

  2. 22 June 2017Sweden

    22 June 2017Sweden

    Decision of the Svea Court of Appeal dated 22 June 2017

    Svea Court of Appeal

    Decision summary
    The Svea Court of Appeal dismissed Belaya ptitsa-Kursk's application to have the arbitral award declared enforceable in Sweden because Robot Grader AB had been unable to present its case.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Belaya ptitsa-Kursk
    Robot Grader AB
    Svea Court of Appeal

    10 months and 12 days later · 316 days

  3. 4 May 2018Sweden

    4 May 2018Sweden

    Decision of the Swedish Supreme Court dated 4 May 2018

    Supreme Court of Sweden

    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court rejected Belaya ptitsa-Kursk's appeal and refused to declare the Russian arbitral award enforceable in Sweden. Robot Grader AB had not been given a real opportunity to answer on the merits or prepare its case before the award was made.

    Supporting details

    9 authorities · 7 participants
    Belaya ptitsa-Kursk
    Robot Grader AB
    Supreme Court of Sweden

    Authorities cited

    9
    • Swedish Arbitration Act (1999:116)
      statute
    • New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958)
      statute
    • NJA 1992 s. 733
      case-law
    • NJA 2003 s. 379
      case-law
    • NJA 2010 s. 219
      case-law
    • NJA 2010 s. 508
      case-law
    • Marike Paulsson, The 1958 New York Convention in Action (The 1958 New York Convention in Action (2016))
      academic
    • Stefan Lindskog, Arbitration: A Commentary (Skiljeförfarande. En kommentar, Zeteo, May 2016)
      academic
    • Stefan Lindskog, Arbitration: A Commentary (Skiljeförfarande. En kommentar, 2nd ed. 2012)
      academic
  4. Date not availableRussia

    Date not availableRussia

    Russian decision dismissing Robot Grader AB's challenge to the arbitral award

    Decision summary
    The Russian court dismissed Robot Grader AB's challenge to the arbitral award.

    Supporting details

    1 participant
    Robot Grader AB

Matter record

Report a correction

Belaya ptitsa-Kursk v Robot Grader AB (Swedish Supreme Court decision of 4 May 2018) · Matter