Arbitral Digest

Matter

Beyhaut Padován, Verónica and Others v Saraco, Adrián and Another (Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 3rd Division, Decision 78/2026)

Proceedings involving Beyhaut Padován, Verónica and Others v Saraco, Adrián and Another; linked records state that the Tribunal declared that it lacked jurisdiction over the preparatory jactancia proceeding brought against the respondents before an arbitral process. It held that jurisdiction...

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements

Procedural record

  1. 26 May 2026Uruguay

    26 May 2026Uruguay

    Decision of the Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 3rd Division in the case 2-40046/2026 dated 26 May 2026

    Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 3rd Division

    Case no.
    2-40046/2026
    Citation
    78/2026
    Decision summary
    The Tribunal declared that it lacked jurisdiction over the preparatory jactancia proceeding brought against the respondents before an arbitral process. It held that jurisdiction belonged to the court that would have heard the principal matter absent the arbitration agreement, and directed the claimants to apply to the competent tribunal.

    Participants

    Verónica Beyhaut Padován
    Adrián Saraco
    Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 3rd Division
    Judge
    Gustavo Iribarren
    Judge
    Claudia Kelland
    Other
    Tribunal secretary
    Laura Pérez

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Uruguayan General Code of Procedure (General Code of Procedure (Uruguay))
      statute
    • Uruguay Law No. 15,750 (Law No. 15,750 (Uruguay))
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Beyhaut Padován, Verónica and Others v Saraco, Adrián and Another (Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 3rd Division, Decision 78/2026) · Matter