Arbitral Digest

Matter

S.A.R.L. Brands Invest and Mr [X] [T] v Gilmar S.P.A. (Paris Court of Appeal RG 21/10430)

  1. 15 April 2022France

    15 April 2022France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal in the case RG 21/10430 dated 15 April 2022

    Paris Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    RG 21/10430
    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal declared caduc the act of recourse filed by S.A.R.L. Brands Invest and Mr [X] [T] against the INPI Director General's 6 May 2021 decision in the ICEBAY trademark opposition. The applicants had not filed the required submissions within three months or proved that they had served them on the INPI Director General.

    Supporting details

    1 authority · 11 participants
    Application
    Recourse against the INPI Director General's decision in opposition proceedings concerning the ICEBAY trademark application — Act of recourse declared caduc
    S.A.R.L. Brands Invest
    Representative
    Michèle Mergui (For: S.A.R.L. Brands Invest · Mr [X] [T])
    Mr [X] [T]
    Representative
    Michèle Mergui (For: S.A.R.L. Brands Invest · Mr [X] [T])
    Director General of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI)
    Representative
    Virginie Landais (For: Director General of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI))
    Gilmar S.P.A.
    Paris Court of Appeal
    Advocate General
    Monica D'Onofrio
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    Carole Trejaut

    Authorities cited

    1
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article R.411-29
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

S.A.R.L. Brands Invest and Mr [X] [T] v Gilmar S.P.A. (Paris Court of Appeal RG 21/10430) · Matter