Arbitral Digest

Matter

Carlos Hakim-Daccach v Jorge Hakim-Tawil et al. (Colombian arbitration and related proceedings)

The Matter concerns Dr. Carlos Hakim-Daccach’s claimed one-third ownership of Gyptec, a Colombian company, related foreign proceedings, and Florida jurisdiction and asset-preservation litigation.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Cross-border litigation
  • Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
  • Asset tracing and recovery
  • Interim measures

Procedural record

  1. 26 February 2020United States

    26 February 2020United States

    Opinion of the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida in case 3D19-1629 dated 26 February 2020

    Third District Court of Appeal of Florida

    Case no.
    3D19-1629
    Decision summary
    The court affirmed the trial court’s mandatory injunction requiring the appellants to return $19.5 million to a restricted Miami-Dade County escrow account and prohibiting further transfers from that account pending determination of Dr. Hakim-Daccach’s ownership interest. It held that the injunction protected the identified res of the constructive trust claim and prevented further dissipation of the funds.

    Participants

    Application
    Emergency motion for mandatory injunction — Granted; affirmed
    Application
    Motion for prohibitory injunction against further transfers and dissipation of escrow funds — Granted; affirmed
    Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación
    Representative
    Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Juan P. Morillo (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Daniel Pulecio-Boek (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Gianna Puccinelli (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    David M. Cooper (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Alex H. Loomis (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    James Lee (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Andrew Beyda (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Greenberg Traurig, P.A. (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Elliot H. Scherker (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Brigid F. Cech Samole (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Representative
    Bethany J. M. Pandher (For: Gyptec, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación)
    Carlos Hakim-Daccach
    Representative
    Sequor Law, P.A. (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Edward H. Davis, Jr. (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Arnoldo B. Lacayo (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Amanda E. Finley (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Waldman Barnett, PL (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Glen H. Waldman (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Michael A. Sayre (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Third District Court of Appeal of Florida
    Judge
    Lindsey
    Judge
    Hendon
    Judge
    Miller
    Judge
    Beatrice Butchko

    Authorities cited

    8
    • Credo LLC v. Speyside Invs. Corp. (259 So. 3d 893, 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018))
      case
    • Bay N Gulf, Inc. v. Anchor Seafood, Inc. (971 So. 2d 842, 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007))
      case
    • Canakaris v. Canakaris (382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla. 1980))
      case
    • TJ Mgmt. Grp., L.L.C. v. Zidon (990 So. 2d 623, 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008))
      case
    • Ga. Banking Co. v. GMC Lending & Mortg. Servs. Corp. (923 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006))
      case
    • Vargas v. Vargas (771 So. 2d 594, 595-96 (Fla. 2000))
      case
    • Castillo v. Vlaminck De Castillo (701 So. 2d 1198, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997))
      case
    • Pendergraft v. C.H. (225 So. 3d 420, 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017))
      case

    1 year, 10 months and 24 days later · 693 days

  2. 19 January 2022United States

    19 January 2022United States

    Opinion of the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida in cases 3D20-1566, 3D20-1569, and 3D20-1570 dated 19 January 2022

    Third District Court of Appeal of Florida

    Case no.
    3D20-1566, 3D20-1569, 3D20-1570
    Decision summary
    The court affirmed omnibus orders denying the nonresident defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and their motions to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds. It held that the pleaded tortious communications, escrow conduct, and alleged conversion in Florida supported specific jurisdiction and that the alleged Florida-directed conspiracy supplied sufficient minimum contacts.

    Participants

    Application
    Motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction — Denied; affirmed
    Application
    Motions to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds — Denied; affirmed
    Jorge Hakim-Tawil
    Representative
    Elliot H. Scherker (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Brigid F. Cech Samole (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Humberto H. Ocariz (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    James E. Gillenwater (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Bethany J. M. Pandher (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Edward M. Mullins (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Cristina Cardenas (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Eric F. Leon (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Jason C. Hegt (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    David B. Levin (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Spencer Leach (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Representative
    Kerry J. Miller (For: Jorge Hakim-Tawil)
    Arkata Investment, Inc.
    Ukiah International Corp.
    Leinster Garden Assets, Inc.
    Amersham Enterprises, Inc.
    Gyptec, S.A. (now known as Violet Investment Corp., S.A. En Liquidacion)
    Knauf Distribuidora, S.A.S.
    Knauf de Colombia, S.A.S. (formerly known as Logistics and Technical Services, S.A.S.)
    Knauf International GmbH
    Carlos Hakim-Daccach
    Representative
    Edward H. Davis, Jr. (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Arnoldo B. Lacayo (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Amanda E. Finley (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Christopher A. Noel (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Representative
    Glen H. Waldman (For: Carlos Hakim-Daccach)
    Third District Court of Appeal of Florida
    Judge
    Beatrice Butchko
    Judge
    Hendon
    Judge
    Miller
    Judge
    Bokor

    Authorities cited

    11
    • Florida Statutes, section 48.193 (Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (2021))
      statute
    • Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais (554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989))
      case
    • Gyptec, S.A. v. Hakim-Daccach (299 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020))
      case
    • Wendt v. Horowitz (822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002))
      case
    • Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz (471 U.S. 462 (1985))
      case
    • International Shoe Co. v. Washington (326 U.S. 310 (1945))
      case
    • World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson (444 U.S. 286 (1980))
      case
    • Goodyear Dunlop Tires, S.A. v. Brown (564 U.S. 915 (2011))
      case
    • Envases Venezolanos, S.A. v. Collazo (559 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990))
      case
    • NHB Advisors, Inc. v. Czyzyk (95 So. 3d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012))
      case
    • Machtinger v. Inertial Airline Servs., Inc. (937 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006))
      case
  3. Date not availableArbitration

    Date not availableArbitration

    Colombian arbitration panel award concerning Hakim-Daccach’s ownership interest

    Decision summary
    The Colombian arbitration panel voided the 2009 stock purchase agreement, found that Dr. Carlos Hakim-Daccach had an undisputed 33.33% ownership interest, and directed restoration of his four shares representing that interest.

Matter record

Report a correction

Carlos Hakim-Daccach v Jorge Hakim-Tawil et al. (Colombian arbitration and related proceedings) · Matter