Arbitral Digest

Matter

Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd. v Permanent Investment Co., Ltd. (HCCT 26/2019)

  1. 6 March 2019Arbitration

    6 March 2019Arbitration

    Interim Award dated 6 March 2019, as corrected on 10 April 2019

    Decision summary
    The sole arbitrator made an interim award concerning the parties' construction dispute; it was corrected on 10 April 2019 and later enforced by the court.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd.
    Permanent Investment Co., Ltd.
    Institution
    Arbitrator
    Paul Barrett

    2 months and 4 days later · 65 days

  2. 10 May 2019Hong Kong

    10 May 2019Hong Kong

    Enforcement Order dated 10 May 2019

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Decision summary
    The court ordered enforcement of the interim award, including payment of HK$5,038,264.40 by the respondent to the applicant, and made orders concerning the date of substantial completion of the works and a surety bond.

    Supporting details

    3 participants
    Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd.
    Permanent Investment Co., Ltd.
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    5 months and 15 days later · 168 days

  3. 25 October 2019Hong Kong

    25 October 2019Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in case HCCT 26/2019 dated 25 October 2019

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCCT 26/2019
    Citation
    [2019] HKCFI 2595
    Decision summary
    The court dismissed the respondent's summons to set aside the 10 May 2019 enforcement order for the interim award. It ordered the respondent to pay HK$5,038,264.40 into court within 21 days pending final determination of the leave-to-appeal application in HCCT 27/2019, stayed execution of paragraph 1 of the enforcement order pending that determination, deleted paragraph 1(iii) by consent, and made a costs order nisi against the respondent.

    Supporting details

    3 authorities · 7 participants
    Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd.
    Representative
    Simon Westbrook SC (For: Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd.)
    Representative
    Norton Rose Fulbright Hong Kong (For: Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd.)
    Permanent Investment Co., Ltd.
    Representative
    Eric Chung (For: Permanent Investment Co., Ltd.)
    Representative
    Deacons (For: Permanent Investment Co., Ltd.)
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    3
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609))
      statute
    • Hong Kong Rules of the High Court (Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A))
      statute
    • Middlemiss and Gould (a firm) v Hartlepool Corp ([1972] 1 WLR 1643)
      case law

Matter record

Report a correction

Cheung Kee Fung Cheung Construction Co., Ltd. v Permanent Investment Co., Ltd. (HCCT 26/2019) · Matter