Matter
China State Foundation Engineering Limited v Gold Brilliant Investment Limited (High Court of Hong Kong HCCT 16/2020)
- 8 February 2021Hong Kong
8 February 2021Hong Kong
Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong in the case HCCT 16/2020 dated 8 February 2021
High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 309
- Decision summary
- The Court held that Gold Brilliant's claim for liquidated damages for delay was a liquidated and ascertained sum that could be set off against China State Foundation's claim under the dishonoured cheque. It granted Gold Brilliant leave to defend to the extent of that set-off, rejected the alleged conditional-delivery defence, ordered costs in the cause, and directed the parties to submit agreed directions within 14 days.
Supporting details
15 authorities · 9 participantsChina State Foundation Engineering Limited
- Representative
- Jonathan Wong (For: China State Foundation Engineering Limited)
- Representative
- Leticia Tang (For: China State Foundation Engineering Limited)
- Representative
- J Chan, Yip, So & Partners (For: China State Foundation Engineering Limited)
Gold Brilliant Investment Limited
- Representative
- David Chen (For: Gold Brilliant Investment Limited)
- Representative
- Deacons (For: Gold Brilliant Investment Limited)
High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance
- Judge
- Mimmie Chan
Other
- Witness
- Wong Kin Ming