Arbitral Digest

Matter

Claimant v Defendant (Celle Higher Regional Court 5 U 86/05)

  1. 12 April 2005Germany

    12 April 2005Germany

    Judgment of the Hannover Regional Court dated 12 April 2005

    Hannover Regional Court

    Decision summary
    The court dismissed the claimant's documentary action as inadmissible after the defendant timely invoked the parties' arbitration agreement.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Claimant
    Defendant
    Hannover Regional Court

    4 months and 13 days later · 135 days

  2. 25 August 2005Germany

    25 August 2005Germany

    Judgment of the Celle Higher Regional Court in the case 5 U 86/05 dated 25 August 2005

    Celle Higher Regional Court

    Case no.
    5 U 86/05
    Citation
    OLG Celle, 25 August 2005, 5 U 86/05
    Decision summary
    The court dismissed the claimant's appeal and held the documentary action inadmissible because the parties had made an effective arbitration agreement and the defendant had invoked it. The court held that the arbitration agreement covered the contractual claim and that it could be invoked in the ordinary documentary procedure.

    Supporting details

    2 authorities · 2 participants
    Claimant
    Defendant
    Celle Higher Regional Court

    Authorities cited

    2
    • German Code of Civil Procedure (§ 592 ZPO)
      statute
    • German Code of Civil Procedure (§ 1032 ZPO)
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Claimant v Defendant (Celle Higher Regional Court 5 U 86/05) · Matter