Matter
Claimant v Defendant (Hamm Higher Regional Court, 21 U 16/13)
Court proceedings concerning a construction-contract dispute and an LCIA arbitration agreement, including its scope, form, seat, and independence from the contract.
Procedural record
- 9 July 2013Germany
9 July 2013Germany
Judgment of the Hamm Higher Regional Court in the case 21 U 16/13 dated 9 July 2013
Hamm Higher Regional Court
- Decision summary
- The court dismissed the Claimant's appeal against the Bielefeld Regional Court judgment, holding the damages action inadmissible because the parties had entered into a valid and sufficiently determinate LCIA arbitration agreement covering disputes concerning the construction contract and its validity. The court held that the clause was effective despite the reference to LCIA with a seat in Zurich, satisfied the applicable written-form requirements, was not an unfair standard-term provision, and remained independent of the underlying contract; costs were awarded against the Claimant and leave to appeal was refused.
Participants
Claimant
Defendant
Hamm Higher Regional Court
- Date not availableArbitration
Date not availableArbitration
LCIA arbitration agreement in section 21 of the construction contract dated 4 November 2008
Participants
Claimant
Defendant
- Representative
- Mr C (For: Defendant)