Claimant v Respondent (Higher Regional Court of Munich 34 Sch 34/18)

Procedural record

1. 5 June 2018Russia

   5 June 2018Russia

   Arbitral Award dated 5 June 2018 in Moscow

   International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

   Decision summary

   The sole-arbitrator tribunal ordered the Claimant to pay the Respondent EUR 28,028.20 under framework supply contracts Nos. 8 and 9, RUB 98,500 for legal representation, and USD 7,009 for registration and arbitration fees.

   Participants

   Claimant

   Respondent

   International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation

   Arbitrator

   Sole Arbitrator

   3 years, 5 months and 3 days later · 1252 days

2. 8 November 2021Germany

   8 November 2021Germany

   Order of the Higher Regional Court of Munich in case 34 Sch 34/18 declaring the Moscow arbitral award enforceable

   Higher Regional Court of Munich

   Case no.

   34 Sch 34/18

   Decision summary

   The court declared the 5 June 2018 Moscow arbitral award enforceable under section 1061 of the German Code of Civil Procedure and the New York Convention. It directed payment to Ms X., rejected the objection based on the Respondent's alleged set-off claim, ordered the Respondent to bear the enforcement-proceeding costs, and ordered provisional enforceability.

   Participants

   Application

   Application to declare the 5 June 2018 Moscow arbitral award enforceable — Granted

   Claimant

   Representative

   Applicant (For: Claimant)

   Respondent

   Higher Regional Court of Munich

   Authorities cited

   25

   • New York Convention of 10 June 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (UN Convention, Art. V)
     statute
   • European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration dated 21 April 1961 (European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (21 April 1961))
     statute
   • German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO §§ 1025, 1061, 1062, 1064, 767, 802)
     statute
   • German Civil Code (BGB) (BGB §§ 133, 157)
     statute
   • German Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO § 170)
     statute
   • Judicial Jurisdiction Ordinance of 11 June 2012 (GVBl. S. 295)
     statute
   • BGH NJW-RR 2004, 1504 (NJW-RR 2004, 1504)
     case-law
   • BGH NJW 2015, 1118 (NJW 2015, 1118)
     case-law
   • BGH NJW-RR 2016, 1467 (NJW-RR 2016, 1467)
     case-law
   • OLG Koblenz BeckRS 2011, 412 (BeckRS 2011, 412)
     case-law
   • OLG Frankfurt BeckRS 2019, 16020 (BeckRS 2019, 16020)
     case-law
   • OLG Frankfurt BeckRS 2020, 4606 (BeckRS 2020, 4606)
     case-law
   • BGH SchiedsVZ 2020, 46 (SchiedsVZ 2020, 46)
     case-law
   • BVerfG BeckRS 2004, 24288 (BeckRS 2004, 24288)
     case-law
   • BGH NJW 2000, 3650 (NJW 2000, 3650)
     case-law
   • BGH SchiedsVZ 2009, 126 (SchiedsVZ 2009, 126)
     case-law
   • Senate decision BeckRS 2018, 1172 (BeckRS 2018, 1172)
     case-law
   • OLG Schleswig BeckRS 2013, 21785 (BeckRS 2013, 21785)
     case-law
   • BGH NJW 1986, 1438 (NJW 1986, 1438)
     case-law
   • Gernert in IPRax (IPRax 2020, 78 ff.)
     academic
   • BGH NJW 1979, 2477 (NJW 1979, 2477)
     case-law
   • BGH NJW 1973, 421 (NJW 1973, 421)
     case-law
   • Senate decision NJOZ 2006, 4376 (NJOZ 2006, 4376)
     case-law
   • Senate decision BeckRS 2007, 4685 (BeckRS 2007, 4685)
     case-law
   • OLG Schleswig BeckRS 2012, 21785 (BeckRS 2012, 21785)
     case-law