Arbitral Digest

Matter

SOCIETE COMPAGNIE FRUITIERE v SOCIETE GEORGES DARAS (French Court of Cassation appeals nos. 78-13.153 and 78-14.373)

  1. 27 January 1978France

    27 January 1978France

    Judgment of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal in the damaged-peanut cargo dispute dated 27 January 1978

    Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal

    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal held that the commercial court could hear the dispute because the contractual arbitration procedure could not be implemented, and it found the cargo's damage attributable to an inherent defect, ordered Daras to compensate Lesieur, and required Compagnie Fruitiere to guarantee Daras.

    Supporting details

    5 participants
    SOCIETE LESIEUR COTELLE ET ASSOCIES (SOCIETE LESIEUR)
    SOCIETE GEORGES DARAS (SOCIETE DARAS)
    SOCIETE NAVALE CHARGEURS DELMAS VIELJEUX (SOCIETE DELMAS VIELJEUX)
    SOCIETE COMPAGNIE FRUITIERE
    SOCIETE COOPVIBAM
    Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal
  2. Date not availableFrance

    Date not availableFrance

    Judgment of the French Court of Cassation in appeals nos. 78-13.153 and 78-14.373

    French Court of Cassation

    Case no.
    78-13.153 and 78-14.373
    Decision summary
    The Court of Cassation rejected the appeals against the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal's judgment in the damaged-peanut cargo dispute. It held that the commercial court could hear the dispute because the contractual arbitration procedure had not produced an arbitrator, upheld the finding that the cargo had an inherent defect, and upheld the damages and guarantee findings, including 1,226,660 francs awarded to Lesieur.

    Supporting details

    5 participants
    SOCIETE COMPAGNIE FRUITIERE
    SOCIETE GEORGES DARAS (SOCIETE DARAS)
    SOCIETE LESIEUR COTELLE ET ASSOCIES (SOCIETE LESIEUR)
    SOCIETE NAVALE CHARGEURS DELMAS VIELJEUX (SOCIETE DELMAS VIELJEUX)
    SOCIETE COOPVIBAM
    French Court of Cassation

Matter record

Report a correction

SOCIETE COMPAGNIE FRUITIERE v SOCIETE GEORGES DARAS (French Court of Cassation appeals nos. 78-13.153 and 78-14.373) · Matter