Matter
Messrs X... v Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
- 26 July 2005France
26 July 2005France
Judgment of the Marseille Commercial Court in the Lehimosa ship-construction dispute dated 26 July 2005
Marseille Commercial Court
- Decision summary
- The Marseille Commercial Court rejected Lehimosa's challenge to the state court's jurisdiction and held that it was competent to hear the ship-construction dispute brought by Messrs X... and the other claimants against the construction participants and their insurers.
Supporting details
2 participantsMessrs X...
Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
Marseille Commercial Court
5 months and 29 days later · 182 days
- 24 January 2006France
24 January 2006France
Judgment of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal in the Lehimosa ship-construction dispute dated 24 January 2006
Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal confirmed the Marseille Commercial Court's ruling on jurisdiction, leaving the state court competent to hear the dispute.
Supporting details
2 participantsMessrs X...
Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal
11 months and 30 days later · 364 days
- 23 January 2007France
23 January 2007France
Judgment of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, in the Lehimosa ship-construction dispute dated 23 January 2007
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Citation
- Appeal No. 06-11.157
- Decision summary
- The French Court of Cassation quashed the prior jurisdiction ruling and returned the dispute to the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal for reconsideration on remand.
Supporting details
2 participantsMessrs X...
Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
1 year, 9 months and 22 days later · 661 days
- 14 November 2008France
14 November 2008France
Judgment of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal in the Lehimosa ship-construction dispute dated 14 November 2008
Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- On remand, the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal held the arbitration clause in the vessel delivery and guarantee agreement manifestly void and the jurisdiction clause void, and retained the jurisdiction of the Marseille courts.
Supporting details
2 participantsMessrs X...
Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal
1 year, 11 months and 21 days later · 720 days
- 4 November 2010France
4 November 2010France
Judgment of the French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber dated 4 November 2010
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Decision summary
- The French Court of Cassation held that the state court could not reject the arbitration clause without identifying manifest nullity or inapplicability, and that the Court of Appeal had added an unwarranted requirement to the written jurisdiction-clause conditions in Article 23(1)(a) of Brussels I. It quashed the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal judgment in all its provisions and remanded the case to the Montpellier Court of Appeal; Messrs X... were ordered to pay costs and EUR 3,000 to Lehimosa under Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure.
Supporting details
4 authorities · 8 participantsMessrs X...
Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa)
- Representative
- SCP Masse-Dessen et Thouvenin (For: Levantina de Hydraulica y Motores (Lehimosa))
Catalana Occidente Reg Reas
Moteurs Baudouin
Axa France IARD
Talleres Mecanicos Bacare
Winterthur
French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber