Arbitral Digest

Matter

Curtiembre Paris S.A. v Boxmark Leather d.o.o. (Croatia) and Others (Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 6th Turn, case SEI 274/2024)

Applicable rules
Statutes of the General Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Services of Uruguay · Arbitration Rules of the General Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Services of Uruguay · Conciliation and Arbitration Center Arbitration Rules
  1. 15 November 2024Uruguay

    15 November 2024Uruguay

    Interlocutory judgment of the Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 6th Turn, in case SEI 274/2024 dated 15 November 2024

    Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 6th Turn

    Case no.
    274/2024
    Decision summary
    The court rejected the jurisdictional exception and the objection that the claim was manifestly inadmissible. It granted Curtiembre Paris S.A.'s request for the forced constitution of the arbitral tribunal and ordered a hearing to draw the two remaining arbitrators needed to complete the three-member tribunal.

    Supporting details

    13 authorities · 15 participants
    Curtiembre Paris S.A.
    Toredo S.A.
    Representative
    Pamela Moreira (For: Toredo S.A. · Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG · Unicut AG)
    Representative
    Valeria Moreira (For: Toredo S.A. · Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG)
    Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG
    Representative
    Pamela Moreira (For: Toredo S.A. · Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG · Unicut AG)
    Representative
    Valeria Moreira (For: Toredo S.A. · Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG)
    Unicut AG
    Representative
    Pamela Moreira (For: Toredo S.A. · Boxmark Leather GmbH & Co KG · Unicut AG)
    Boxmark Leather d.o.o. (Croatia)
    Boxmark Leather México S.A. de C.V.
    Pieles Azteca S.A. de C.V.
    Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 6th Turn
    Other

    Authorities cited

    13
    • Uruguayan International Commercial Arbitration Act (Law No. 19.636)
      statute
    • Uruguayan General Code of Procedure (General Code of Procedure (CGP))
      statute
    • Uruguayan Law amending the General Code of Procedure (Law No. 19.090)
      statute
    • Uruguayan Civil Code (Civil Code)
      statute
    • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention, 1958)
      treaty
    • Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (Panama Convention, 1975)
      treaty
    • Mercosur Agreement on International Commercial Arbitration (Agreement on International Commercial Arbitration of Mercosur)
      treaty
    • Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 2nd Turn, judgment No. 2/2011 (Judgment No. 2/2011 (16 February 2011))
      case
    • Santiago Pereira Campos, Revista de Derecho, Universidad de Montevideo (Year II, No. 4, p. 87)
      academic
    • Cerisola, International Arbitration in Commercial Contracts (Revista de Derecho Comercial, FCU, Third Series, No. I (2008), pp. 138, 142, 149–150)
      academic
    • Francesco Carnelutti, General Theory of Law (Teoría General del Derecho, Madrid (1941), p. 311)
      academic
    • Mateo Verdías Mezzeray and Joaquín Garino Podestá, The New International Commercial Arbitration Act in Uruguay (Revista de Derecho de la Universidad de Montevideo, No. 34 (2018))
      academic
    • Fresnedo opinion (Consultation by Fresnedo cited in the judgment)
      academic

Matter record

Report a correction

Curtiembre Paris S.A. v Boxmark Leather d.o.o. (Croatia) and Others (Tribunal of Appeals in Civil Matters, 6th Turn, case SEI 274/2024) · Matter