Arbitral Digest

Matter

Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union (Court of Justice of the European Union, C-363/25 P, 16 July 2026)

  1. 28 June 2023European Union

    28 June 2023European Union

    Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-239/21 dated 28 June 2023

    General Court of the European Union

    Case no.
    T-239/21
    Citation
    T-239/21, EU:T:2023:364
    Decision summary
    The General Court dismissed Dana Astra's action challenging the 2021 and 2022 restrictive-measures maintaining acts concerning it.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Dana Astra IOOO
    Council of the European Union
    General Court of the European Union

    1 year, 8 months and 19 days later · 630 days

  2. 19 March 2025European Union

    19 March 2025European Union

    Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-281/23 dated 19 March 2025

    General Court of the European Union

    Case no.
    T-281/23
    Citation
    T-281/23, EU:T:2025:315
    Decision summary
    The General Court dismissed Dana Astra's action for annulment of the 2023 and 2024 restrictive-measures maintaining acts concerning it.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Dana Astra IOOO
    Council of the European Union
    General Court of the European Union

    1 year, 3 months and 27 days later · 484 days

  3. 16 July 2026European Union

    16 July 2026European Union

    Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-363/25 P dated 16 July 2026

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    Case no.
    C-363/25 P
    Citation
    C-363/25 P
    Decision summary
    The Court of Justice upheld the General Court's finding that Dana Astra's action challenging the 2023 and 2024 restrictive-measures maintaining acts was out of time, but held that the appeal was well founded on the notification issue. After reviewing the merits, it dismissed the appeal because the General Court's rejection of the substantive challenge was sufficient to support the outcome, and ordered Dana Astra to bear its own costs and pay the Council's costs.

    Supporting details

    13 authorities · 14 participants
    Dana Astra IOOO
    Representative
    M. Birdling (For: Dana Astra IOOO)
    Representative
    M. Lester (For: Dana Astra IOOO)
    Representative
    K. Van Maldegem (For: Dana Astra IOOO)
    Council of the European Union
    Representative
    L. Berger (For: Council of the European Union)
    Representative
    S. Van Overmeire (For: Council of the European Union)
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Advocate General
    J. Kokott
    Other
    Institutional administrator
    A. Calot Escobar

    Authorities cited

    13
    • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
      statute
    • Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
      statute
    • Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union
      statute
    • Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (Regulation (EC) No 765/2006)
      statute
    • Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (Decision 2012/642/CFSP)
      statute
    • El-Qaddafi v Council (T-322/19, EU:T:2021:206)
      case-law
    • WhatsApp Ireland v European Data Protection Board (C-97/23 P, EU:C:2026:81)
      case-law
    • Gbagbo and Others v Council (C-478/11 P to C-482/11 P, EU:C:2013:258)
      case-law
    • Grodno Azot and Khimvolokno Plant v Council (C-326/24 P, EU:C:2025:522)
      case-law
    • Timchenko v Council (C-703/23 P, EU:C:2025:608)
      case-law
    • UC v Council (C-455/24 P, EU:C:2026:253)
      case-law
    • United Parcel Service v Commission (C-297/22 P, EU:C:2023:1027)
      case-law
    • Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union (Court of Justice of the European Union, C-363/25 P, 16 July 2026) · Matter