Arbitral Digest

Matter

DJP and others v DJO (Singapore Court of Appeal [2025] SGCA(I) 2)

ICC arbitration over additional payment under the CPT-13 contract and Singapore litigation involving copied parallel awards and equal treatment of parties.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Setting aside arbitral awards
  • Parallel proceedings
  • Construction arbitration
  • UNCITRAL Model Law
  • Public policy
Seat
Singapore
Applicable rules
ICC Rules of Arbitration (in force from 1 January 2021)
Substantive governing law
Indian law

Procedural record

  1. 24 November 2023Singapore

    24 November 2023Singapore

    Award in the CPT-13 Arbitration dated 24 November 2023

    International Chamber of Commerce

    Decision summary
    The tribunal found that the Indian minimum-wage notification was a change in legislation under clause 13.7, held the respondent liable for additional payment, and rejected the respondent's limitation, waiver, and notice-of-claim objections.

    Participants

    DJP
    DJQ
    DJR
    DJO
    International Chamber of Commerce
    Arbitrator
    Krishn Kumar Lahoti
    Arbitrator
    Gita Mittal
    Arbitrator
    Dipak Misra

    1 year, 4 months and 15 days later · 501 days

  2. 8 April 2025Singapore

    8 April 2025Singapore

    Judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore in the case Civil Appeal No 6 of 2024 dated 8 April 2025

    Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

    Case no.
    Civil Appeal No 6 of 2024
    Citation
    [2025] SGCA(I) 2
    Decision summary
    The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of the entire CPT-13 award for breach of natural justice under section 24(b) of the International Arbitration Act 1994. The breach concerned the process used to prepare the award by copying from parallel awards and permeated the whole award; remission was no longer available on appeal after the award had been set aside at first instance.

    Participants

    DJP
    Representative
    Francis Xavier SC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alina Chia (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alvin Tay (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Juhi Agrawal (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Ashish Chugh (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Nicholas Tan (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Yap Yong Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Cynthia Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Wong & Leow LLC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    DJQ
    Representative
    Francis Xavier SC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alina Chia (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alvin Tay (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Juhi Agrawal (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Ashish Chugh (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Nicholas Tan (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Yap Yong Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Cynthia Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Wong & Leow LLC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    DJR
    Representative
    Francis Xavier SC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alina Chia (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Alvin Tay (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Juhi Agrawal (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Ashish Chugh (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Nicholas Tan (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Yap Yong Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Cynthia Li (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    Representative
    Wong & Leow LLC (For: DJP · DJQ · DJR)
    DJO
    Representative
    Toby Landau KC (For: DJO)
    Representative
    Tham Lijing (For: DJO)
    Representative
    Rochelle Lim (For: DJO)
    Representative
    Tham Lijing LLC (For: DJO)
    Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore
    Judge
    Sundaresh Menon
    Judge
    Steven Chong
    Judge
    David Edmond Neuberger

    Authorities cited

    42
    • International Arbitration Act 1994 (Singapore) (International Arbitration Act 1994 (2020 Rev Ed))
      statute
    • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
      model-law
    • DJO v DJP and others [2024] SGHC(I) 24
      case-law
    • Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86
      case-law
    • Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni [2007] 1 SLR(R) 95
      case-law
    • China Machine New Energy Corp v Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC and another [2020] 1 SLR 695
      case-law
    • Gas & Fuel Corporation of Victoria v Wood Hall Ltd & Leonard Pipeline Contractors Ltd [1978] VR 385
      case-law
    • Tan Tiang Hin Jerry v Singapore Medical Council [2000] 1 SLR(R) 553
      case-law
    • Arbitration in Singapore: A Practical Guide (Sundaresh Menon CJ ed-in-chief) (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd Ed, 2018)
      academic
    • Re Chuang Wei Ping [1993] 3 SLR(R) 357
      case-law
    • BOI v BOJ [2018] 2 SLR 1156
      case-law
    • DJK and others v DJN [2024] SGHC 309
      case-law
    • Sim Yong Teng and another v Singapore Swimming Club [2016] 2 SLR 489
      case-law
    • Front Row Investment Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Daimler South East Asia Pte Ltd [2010] SGHC 80
      case-law
    • CFJ and another v CFL and another and other matters [2023] 3 SLR 1
      case-law
    • JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd [2016] 4 SLR 768
      case-law
    • Pacific Recreation Pte Ltd v S Y Technology Inc and another appeal [2008] 2 SLR(R) 491
      case-law
    • Lim Chee Huat v Public Prosecutor [2019] 5 SLR 433
      case-law
    • Newton, David Christoper v Public Prosecutor [2024] 3 SLR 1370
      case-law
    • Cojocaru v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre [2013] 2 SCR 357
      case-law
    • Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Co Ltd v Eastern Bechtel Corpn and Chemical Engineering & Construction Co Ltd [1982] 2 Lloyd's Rep 425
      case-law
    • Tjong Very Sumito and others v Antig Investments Pte Ltd [2009] 4 SLR(R) 732
      case-law
    • L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd [2013] 1 SLR 125
      case-law
    • Yap Ah Lai v Public Prosecutor [2014] 3 SLR 180
      case-law
    • Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi Group (Glass) Co Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 114
      case-law
    • Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (A/CN.9/264, 25 March 1985)
      commentary
    • Singapore International Arbitration: Law & Practice (David Joseph and David Foxton gen eds, LexisNexis, 2014)
      academic
    • Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 3rd Ed, 2021)
      academic
    • ICC Rules
      arbitration-rules
    • IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (25 May 2024)
      guidelines
    • Sundaresh Menon, Adjudicator, Advocate, or something in between? Coming to terms with the role of the party-appointed arbitrator (Sundaresh Menon CJ, "Adjudicator, Advocate, or something in between? Coming to terms with the role of the party-appointed arbitrator" (2017) 34:3 Journal of International Arbitration 347)
      academic
    • QYFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 15
      case-law
    • Stubbs v The Queen [2018] UKPC 30
      case-law
    • AKN and another v ALC and others and other appeals [2015] 3 SLR 488
      case-law
    • Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd v Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd [2025] 1 SLR 88
      case-law
    • AKN and another v ALK and others and other appeals [2016] 1 SLR 966
      case-law
    • CBS v CBP [2021] 1 SLR 935
      case-law
    • CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505
      case-law
    • CNQ v CNR [2023] 4 SLR 1031
      case-law
    • G (A Child: Care Order) (Complex Developmental Needs) (No. 1) [2023] EWFC 168 (B)
      case-law
    • HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority and another [2015] 1 WLR 4341
      case-law
    • Zemalt Holdings SA v Nu-Life Upholstery Repairs Ltd [1985] 2 EGLR 14
      case-law
  3. Date not availableSingapore

    Date not availableSingapore

    Judgment of the High Court in the case Originating Application No 8 of 2024

    High Court

    Case no.
    Originating Application No 8 of 2024
    Citation
    [2024] SGHC(I) 24
    Decision summary
    The High Court set aside the CPT-13 award for breach of natural justice arising from the tribunal's use of two parallel awards as templates. It found it unnecessary to determine the remaining grounds alleging breach of the agreed arbitral procedure and Singapore public policy.

    Participants

    DJO
    DJP
    DJQ
    DJR
    High Court

Matter record

Report a correction

DJP and others v DJO (Singapore Court of Appeal [2025] SGCA(I) 2) · Matter