Arbitral Digest

Matter

Egetürk Wurst-und Fleischwarenfabrikation GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft v Mr [P] [C] (Paris Court of Appeal RG 23/14378)

  1. 4 December 2024France

    4 December 2024France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 1 in the case RG 23/14378 dated 4 December 2024

    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 1

    Case no.
    RG 23/14378
    Citation
    No. 143/2024
    Decision summary
    The court declared EGETÜRK's new evidence inadmissible and rejected its appeal against the INPI decision in opposition OPP 22-4189/GB. It found no likelihood of confusion between the contested sign LA TRADITION DU BON TONTON BELDI WWW.TONTONBELDI.COM and EGETÜRK's earlier TONTON mark, and refused the claim for costs under Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure.

    Supporting details

    2 authorities · 10 participants
    EGETÜRK WURST-UND FLEISCHWARENFABRIKATION GMBH & CO. Kommanditgesellschaft
    Representative
    Christian ROTH (For: EGETÜRK WURST-UND FLEISCHWARENFABRIKATION GMBH & CO. Kommanditgesellschaft)
    Representative
    SELASU ROTHPARTNERS (For: EGETÜRK WURST-UND FLEISCHWARENFABRIKATION GMBH & CO. Kommanditgesellschaft)
    Institut national de la propriété industrielle
    Representative
    Marie BUCCHINI (For: Institut national de la propriété industrielle)
    [P] [C]
    Paris Court of Appeal, Division 5 - Chamber 1
    Other
    Court Reporter
    Soufiane HASSAOUI

    Authorities cited

    2
    • French Intellectual Property Code, Article R.411-19
      statute
    • French Code of Civil Procedure, Article 700
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Egetürk Wurst-und Fleischwarenfabrikation GmbH & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft v Mr [P] [C] (Paris Court of Appeal RG 23/14378) · Matter