Arbitral Digest

Matter

ETAP v Bomar Oil NV (French Court of Cassation)

ETAP v Bomar Oil concerns an arbitral jurisdiction objection, incorporation of an arbitration clause, and French court review of the award challenge.

  • Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements
Seat
France
Applicable rules
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

Procedural record

  1. 25 January 1985France

    25 January 1985France

    Arbitral award dated 25 January 1985

    Decision summary
    The arbitral tribunal rejected Bomar Oil NV's objection that it lacked jurisdiction.

    Participants

    Entreprise Tunisienne d'Activités Pétrolières
    Bomar Oil NV

    1 year, 11 months and 26 days later · 725 days

  2. 20 January 1987France

    20 January 1987France

    Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal dated 20 January 1987

    Paris Court of Appeal

    Decision summary
    The Paris Court of Appeal rejected Bomar Oil NV's application to set aside the arbitral award.

    Participants

    Entreprise Tunisienne d'Activités Pétrolières
    Bomar Oil NV
    Paris Court of Appeal

    2 years, 8 months and 21 days later · 995 days

  3. 11 October 1989France

    11 October 1989France

    Judgment of the French Court of Cassation in ETAP v Bomar Oil NV

    French Court of Cassation

    Decision summary
    The French Court of Cassation held that an arbitration clause incorporated by reference into a contract must be mentioned in the main agreement, unless habitual dealings establish the parties' complete knowledge of the written terms governing their commercial relationship. It quashed and annulled the Paris Court of Appeal judgment of 20 January 1987 and remanded the case to the Versailles Court of Appeal.

    Participants

    Entreprise Tunisienne d'Activités Pétrolières
    Bomar Oil NV
    French Court of Cassation

    Authorities cited

    2
    • New York Convention of 10 June 1958
      treaty
    • French law applicable at the seat of the arbitration
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

ETAP v Bomar Oil NV (French Court of Cassation) · Matter