Matter
ETF v Matisa (Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, joined appeals P 19-15.728 and H 19-16.711, 30 September 2020)
French proceedings concerning the scope of an arbitration clause in a rail-equipment dispute and the proper forum for arbitral relief.
Procedural record
- 30 September 2020France
30 September 2020France
Judgment of the Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber in joined appeals P 19-15.728 and H 19-16.711 dated 30 September 2020
Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Citation
- Cass. 1re civ., 30 September 2020, No. 560 F-D
- Decision summary
- The Court of Cassation partially quashed the Paris Court of Appeal's decision without remand. It held that the dispute arising from the replacement and analysis of the train's suspension springs was manifestly within the arbitration clause in Matisa Suisse's general conditions, but ruled that the court could only refer the parties to seek relief before the appropriate arbitral tribunal rather than designate the ICC Court of Arbitration in Paris as the referral jurisdiction.
Participants
ETF
- Representative
- SCP Buk-Lament Robillot (For: ETF)
Matisa
- Representative
- SARL Cabinet Munier-Apaire (For: Matisa · Matisa matériel industriel)
Matisa matériel industriel
- Representative
- SARL Cabinet Munier-Apaire (For: Matisa · Matisa matériel industriel)
AXA France IARD
- Representative
- SCP Boutet et Hourdeaux (For: AXA France IARD)
Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber
- Judge
- Batut
- Judge
- Hascher
- Judge
- Auroy