Arbitral Digest

Matter

Exchange Union Co and others v Wo Qi and others (Singapore High Court Originating Claim No 107 of 2024)

  1. 12 June 2026Singapore

    12 June 2026Singapore

    Judgment of the General Division of the High Court of Singapore in Originating Claim No 107 of 2024 dated 12 June 2026

    General Division of the High Court of Singapore

    Case no.
    Originating Claim No 107 of 2024; Summonses Nos 1750, 1751 and 2292 of 2025
    Citation
    [2026] SGHC 124
    Decision summary
    The court dismissed the defendants’ applications for a forum non conveniens stay and their alternative applications for a case management stay pending the PRC divorce proceedings. It held that the active defendants had waived their right to seek a forum non conveniens stay, and that the PRC was not shown to be the clearly or distinctly more appropriate forum; the parallel divorce proceedings did not justify a case management stay.

    Supporting details

    27 authorities · 19 participants
    Exchange Union Co
    Representative
    Ng Jern Fei KC (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Expert
    Ren Wenxia (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    C2
    Representative
    Ng Jern Fei KC (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Expert
    Ren Wenxia (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    C3
    Representative
    Ng Jern Fei KC (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Expert
    Ren Wenxia (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Wo Wei Dong
    Representative
    Ng Jern Fei KC (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Expert
    Ren Wenxia (For: Exchange Union Co · C2 · C3 · Wo Wei Dong)
    Wo Qi
    Representative
    Daniel Chia (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · Wo Quan)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    Sun Hongmin
    Representative
    Daniel Chia (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · Wo Quan)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    D3
    Representative
    Jonathan Tang (For: D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    D4
    Representative
    Jonathan Tang (For: D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    D8
    D9
    Representative
    Jonathan Tang (For: D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    D10
    Representative
    Jonathan Tang (For: D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    D11
    Representative
    Jonathan Tang (For: D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    Wo Quan
    Representative
    Daniel Chia (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · Wo Quan)
    Expert
    Yun Zhi (For: Wo Qi · Sun Hongmin · D3 · D4 · D9 · D10 · D11 · Wo Quan)
    General Division of the High Court of Singapore

    Authorities cited

    27
    • Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd ([1987] AC 460)
      case-law
    • Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling Corp v PT Airfast Services Indonesia ([1992] 2 SLR(R) 345)
      case-law
    • Chai Cher Watt v SDL Technologies Pte Ltd ([2012] 1 SLR 152)
      case-law
    • Civelli, Carlo Giuseppe v Mulacek, Philippe Emanuel ([2019] SGHC 182)
      case-law
    • Reputation Administration Service Pte Ltd v Spamhaus Technology Ltd ([2021] 2 SLR 342)
      case-law
    • Wing Hak Man v Bio-Treat Technology Ltd ([2009] 1 SLR(R) 446)
      case-law
    • CIMB Bank Bhd v Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd ([2008] 4 SLR(R) 543)
      case-law
    • Rappo, Tania v Accent Delight International Ltd ([2017] 2 SLR 265)
      case-law
    • JIO Minerals FZC v Mineral Enterprises Ltd ([2011] 1 SLR 391)
      case-law
    • MAN Diesel & Turbo SE v IM Skaugen SE ([2020] 1 SLR 327)
      case-law
    • Xu Xiangrong v Fu Xianwei ([2025] SGHC 95)
      case-law
    • Fan Heli v Zhang Shujing ([2016] 1 SLR 1457)
      case-law
    • Trisuryo Garuda Nusa v SKP Pradiksi (North) Sdn Bhd ([2017] 2 SLR 814)
      case-law
    • Rickshaw Investments Ltd v Nicolai Baron von Uexkull ([2007] 1 SLR(R) 377)
      case-law
    • Ivanishvili, Bidzina v Credit Suisse Trust Ltd ([2020] 2 SLR 638)
      case-law
    • Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian ([2006] 2 SLR(R) 381)
      case-law
    • BNP Paribas Wealth Management v Jacob Agam ([2017] 3 SLR 27)
      case-law
    • Universal Entertainment Corporation v Glas Trust Company LLC ([2022] HKCFI 3454)
      case-law
    • PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd ([2015] 5 SLR 873)
      case-law
    • Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart ([2017] FCAFC 170)
      case-law
    • Rules of Court 2021 (ROC 2021)
      statute
    • Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969 (2020 Rev Ed)
      statute
    • Arbitration Act
      statute
    • Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B, 2006 Rev Ed)
      statute
    • Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with Speculation Risks in Virtual Currency Trading (Yin Fa [2021] No 237)
      statute
    • Commercial Conflict of Laws (Academy Publishing, 2023)
      academic
    • Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Conflict of Laws (vol 2, 16th Ed, 2022)
      academic

Matter record

Report a correction

Exchange Union Co and others v Wo Qi and others (Singapore High Court Originating Claim No 107 of 2024) · Matter