Matter
Flashbird Limited v Compagnie de Securite Privee et Industrielle - MARC Case No. A16-8
- 24 October 2017Mauritius
24 October 2017Mauritius
MARC Award in Case No. A16-8
MARC of the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- Award no.
- A16-8
- Decision summary
- The tribunal declared itself competent, ordered judicial resolution of the 0913/13 consultancy framework agreement, and ordered Flashbird Limited to restitute USD 15,000 and EUR 80,000 with interest, pay EUR 24,000 in damages, and reimburse arbitration and legal costs. Other claims were rejected.
Supporting details
1 authority · 3 participantsFlashbird Limited
Compagnie de Securite Privee et Industrielle
MARC of the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- Arbitrator
- [E] [G]
27 days later · 27 days
- 20 November 2017France
20 November 2017France
Exequatur order of the President of the Paris Tribunal de grande instance dated 20 November 2017
Tribunal de grande instance of Paris
- Decision summary
- The President of the Paris Tribunal de grande instance granted exequatur in France to the MARC award rendered on 24 October 2017 in Case No. A16-8.
1 year and 10 days later · 375 days
- 30 November 2018Mauritius
30 November 2018Mauritius
Decision of the Supreme Court of Mauritius on the MARC award in Case No. A16-8 dated 30 November 2018
Supreme Court of Mauritius
- Decision summary
- The Supreme Court of Mauritius rejected Flashbird Limited's application to set aside the MARC award in Case No. A16-8.
1 year, 10 months and 20 days later · 690 days
- 20 October 2020France
20 October 2020France
Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal in case RG 18/07943 dated 20 October 2020
Paris Court of Appeal
- Decision summary
- The Paris Court of Appeal set aside the Paris exequatur order of 20 November 2017 and rejected CSPI's application to enforce the MARC award in Case No. A16-8. It held that the arbitration clause required arbitration under the ICC Rules and did not confer jurisdiction on the permanent arbitration court of the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry; the tribunal therefore had wrongly assumed jurisdiction. Flashbird's request to annul the award under Article 1520 of the French Code of Civil Procedure was inadmissible in this appeal.
Supporting details
2 authorities · 11 participantsFlashbird Limited
- Representative
- Anex Management Services Ltd (For: Flashbird Limited)
- Representative
- Lucas Domenach (For: Flashbird Limited)
Compagnie de Securite Privee et Industrielle
- Representative
- Frederic Lallemant (For: Compagnie de Securite Privee et Industrielle)
- Representative
- Bruno Roca Grau (For: Compagnie de Securite Privee et Industrielle)
Paris Court of Appeal
- Judge
- Anne Beauvois
- Judge
- Francois Melin
Other
- Court Reporter
- Sonia Dairain
- Court Reporter
- Melanie Pate