Matter
G v N (High Court of Hong Kong HCCT 38/2021, HCCT 28/2023 and HCCT 52/2023; [2023] HKCFI 3366)
- 23 April 2021Arbitration
23 April 2021Arbitration
Interim Preservation Order dated 23 April 2021
- Decision summary
- The arbitrator granted an interim preservation order restraining N from disposing of approximately US$90 million in consideration monies paid under the share placement, or their traceable proceeds.
Supporting details
2 participantsG
N
6 days later · 6 days
- 29 April 2021Hong Kong
29 April 2021Hong Kong
Court order enforcing the interim preservation order dated 29 April 2021
Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong
- Decision summary
- The Court granted leave to enforce the arbitral tribunal's interim preservation order as an order of the court, restraining N and companies controlled by it from transferring or disposing of the consideration monies and their traceable proceeds.
Supporting details
2 participantsG
N
Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong
1 year, 11 months and 8 days later · 707 days
- 6 April 2023Arbitration
6 April 2023Arbitration
First Partial Award dated 6 April 2023
- Decision summary
- The arbitrator found the placement illegal, dismissed G's personal restitutionary claim and proprietary restitutionary claim based on unclean hands, and upheld N's counterclaim for damages arising from unlawful act conspiracy and/or dishonest assistance without quantifying damages.
Supporting details
2 participantsG
N
3 months and 22 days later · 113 days
- 28 July 2023Arbitration
28 July 2023Arbitration
Second Partial Award dated 28 July 2023
- Decision summary
- The arbitrator quantified the damages payable by G to N at US$11,096,822 and US$1,924,541.53, with interest and costs.
Supporting details
2 participantsG
N
5 months and 1 day later · 154 days
- 29 December 2023Hong Kong
29 December 2023Hong Kong
Decision of the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong in cases HCCT 38/2021, HCCT 28/2023 and HCCT 52/2023 dated 29 December 2023
Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 3366
- Decision summary
- The Court suspended the setting-aside proceedings for three months under Article 34(4) of the Model Law and remitted the matter to the arbitrator to consider whether the awards were affected by Hong Kong public policy on illegality. It dismissed G's separate challenge based on Clause 6.10(e), continued the order enforcing the interim preservation order, and ordered G to pay 20% of the setting-aside costs to N on an indemnity basis, with the balance reserved.
Supporting details
15 authorities · 10 participantsG
- Representative
- Benjamin Yu SC (For: G)
- Representative
- Tom Ng (For: G)
- Representative
- Stevenson, Wong & Co (For: G)
N
- Representative
- Jin Pao SC (For: N)
- Representative
- Zenith Chan (For: N)
- Representative
- Gall (For: N)
Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong
- Judge
- Mimmie Chan
Other
- Witness
- Cricenti