Arbitral Digest

Matter

Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union (Court of Justice C-695/23 P)

The Court of Justice considered EU restrictive measures against Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya as a person associated with a listed Russian businessperson and dismissed her appeal concerning family association, legal certainty, proportionality, and fundamental rights.

  • Sanctions disputes
  • Cross-border litigation
Industry type
Manufacturing

Procedural record

  1. 15 October 2026Luxembourg

    15 October 2026Luxembourg

    Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) in Case C-695/23 P dated 15 October 2026

    Court of Justice of the European Union, Tenth Chamber

    Case no.
    C-695/23 P
    Decision summary
    The Court dismissed Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya's appeal against the General Court judgment, holding that the Council was entitled to treat her as associated with her husband under the EU restrictive-measures regime and rejecting the challenges concerning legal certainty, proportionality, and fundamental rights. It ordered her to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Council.

    Participants

    Application
    Appeal seeking to set aside the General Court judgment and annul the restrictive measures insofar as they concerned Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya — Appeal dismissed
    Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya
    Representative
    A. Egger (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Representative
    P. Goeth (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Representative
    G. Lansky (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Representative
    E. Steiner (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Representative
    M.F. Ciancio (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Representative
    A. Saccucci (For: Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya)
    Council of the European Union
    Representative
    B. Driessen (For: Council of the European Union)
    Representative
    S. Van Overmeire (For: Council of the European Union)
    Court of Justice of the European Union, Tenth Chamber
    Judge
    B. Smulders
    Judge
    M.L. Arastey Sahún
    Judge
    J. Passer
    Advocate General
    L. Medina
    Court registrar
    V. Di Bucci

    Authorities cited

    14
    • Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
      treaty provision
    • Article 21 TEU (Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union)
      treaty provision
    • Article 215 TFEU (Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
      treaty provision
    • Article 256 TFEU (Article 256 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)
      treaty provision
    • Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
      treaty provision
    • Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014
      decision
    • Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014
      regulation
    • Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/397 of 9 March 2022
      decision
    • Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/396 of 9 March 2022
      regulation
    • Pumpyanskaya v Council (T-272/22, EU:T:2023:491)
      case-law
    • Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council (C-696/23 P, C-704/23 P, C-711/23 P, C-35/24 P and C-111/24 P, EU:C:2026:245)
      case-law
    • Timchenko v Council (C-703/23 P, EU:C:2025:608)
      case-law
    • VTB Bank v Council (C-729/18 P, EU:C:2020:499)
      case-law
    • PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v Commission (C-112/23 P, EU:C:2024:899)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union (Court of Justice C-695/23 P) · Matter