Arbitral Digest

Matter

Glory Empire Global Ltd v Bateson Investment Limited (High Court of Hong Kong HCA 866/2017)

  1. 13 April 2017Hong Kong

    13 April 2017Hong Kong

    Interim injunction order dated 13 April 2017

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCA 866/2017
    Decision summary
    By consent and subject to the plaintiff’s undertaking to produce the original documents relating to Mr Lu’s appointment by 19 April 2017, the court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from enforcing the Share Charge pursuant to the Enforcement Notice pending the substantive hearing of the plaintiff’s summons.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Glory Empire Global Ltd
    Bateson Investment Limited
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    1 month and 24 days later · 54 days

  2. 6 June 2017Hong Kong

    6 June 2017Hong Kong

    Consent order dated 6 June 2017

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCA 866/2017
    Decision summary
    The court ordered by consent that the plaintiff’s application for the costs of the action, including all reserved costs, be determined summarily and heard together with the Strike Out Summons.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Glory Empire Global Ltd
    Bateson Investment Limited
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    2 months and 11 days later · 72 days

  3. 17 August 2017Hong Kong

    17 August 2017Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in the case HCA 866 of 2017 dated 17 August 2017

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCA 866/2017
    Decision summary
    The court dismissed the defendant’s Strike Out Summons and refused to stay the action pending arbitration. It granted the plaintiff leave to discontinue the action and made no order as to the costs of the action or the two applications, subject to prior costs orders and an order nisi concerning application costs.

    Supporting details

    10 authorities · 11 participants
    Glory Empire Global Ltd
    Representative
    Linda Chan (For: Glory Empire Global Ltd)
    Representative
    Justin Ho (For: Glory Empire Global Ltd)
    Representative
    Latham & Watkins (For: Glory Empire Global Ltd)
    Bateson Investment Limited
    Representative
    Paul Shieh (For: Bateson Investment Limited)
    Representative
    Jonathan Chang (For: Bateson Investment Limited)
    Representative
    King & Wood Mallesons (For: Bateson Investment Limited)
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance
    Other

    Authorities cited

    10
    • Ta Tung China & Arts Ltd v Fontana Restaurant Ltd ([1999] 1 HKLRD 404)
      case-law
    • R (Boxall) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council (Unreported, 21 December 2000)
      case-law
    • Lai Yuet Chun v Super Deluxe International Ltd (HCCW 186/2001, 3 June 2003)
      case-law
    • Graham M Morley v Kwan Wo San (HCA 4366/2003, 30 December 2009)
      case-law
    • Re Chinese United Establishments Ltd (HCCW 391/1994, 5 October 1995)
      case-law
    • BCT Software Solutions Ltd v C Brewer & Sons Ltd ([2004] FSR 9)
      case-law
    • Brawley v Marczynski (No 1) ([2003] 1 WLR 813)
      case-law
    • Chitty on Contracts, Volume 1, 32nd edition, paragraph 22-045
      secondary source
    • Rules of the High Court (Hong Kong), Order 1A, rules 1 and 2
      legislation
    • Hong Kong Companies Ordinance Cap 622, section 168A
      legislation

Matter record

Report a correction

Glory Empire Global Ltd v Bateson Investment Limited (High Court of Hong Kong HCA 866/2017) · Matter