Arbitral Digest

Matter

GM1 and GM2 v KC (High Court of Hong Kong HCCT 60/2019)

Case no.
xx
  1. 14 November 2019Hong Kong

    14 November 2019Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in the case HCCT 60/2019 dated 14 November 2019

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCCT 60/2019
    Citation
    [2019] HKCFI 2793
    Decision summary
    The Court held that it had jurisdiction under section 45 of the Arbitration Ordinance to grant an anti-suit injunction as an interim measure and that there was a serious question to be tried on the plaintiffs’ claim. It granted an interim injunction requiring KC to take steps to withdraw or seek a stay of the Suzhou proceedings and restraining further proceedings concerning the Guarantee otherwise than by arbitration, pending the conclusion of the adjourned substantive hearing, with the costs of the 8 November 2019 hearing in the cause of the originating summons.

    Supporting details

    18 authorities · 9 participants
    GM1
    Representative
    Matthew Gearing (For: GM1 · GM2)
    Representative
    Allen & Overy (For: GM1 · GM2)
    GM2
    Representative
    Matthew Gearing (For: GM1 · GM2)
    Representative
    Allen & Overy (For: GM1 · GM2)
    KC
    Representative
    Anson Wong (For: KC)
    Representative
    Stephanie Wong (For: KC)
    Representative
    Stevenson Wong & Co (For: KC)
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    18
    • Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
      statute
    • Fiona Trust & Holding Corp v Privalov ([2007] UKHL 40)
      case-law
    • English Arbitration Act 1996
      statute
    • AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC ([2013] 1 WLR 1889)
      case-law
    • The Angelic Grace ([1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87)
      case-law
    • Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)
      statute
    • High Court Ordinance (Cap. 4)
      statute
    • Hong Kong Rules of High Court (Cap. 4A)
      statute
    • English Senior Courts Act 1981
      statute
    • Ever Judger Holding Co Ltd v Kroman Celik ([2015] 3 HKC 246)
      case-law
    • Donahue v Armco Inc ([2002] CLC 440)
      case-law
    • Giorgio Armani SpA v Elan Clothes Co Ltd ([2019] 2 HKLRD 313)
      case-law
    • S Co v B Co ([2014] 6 HKC 421)
      case-law
    • Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Government of Pakistan ([2011] 1 AC 763 (SC))
      case-law
    • Continental Bank NA v Aeakos Compania Naviera SA ([1994] 1 WLR 588)
      case-law
    • Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v ST-CMS Electric Company Private Ltd ([2007] EWHC 1713 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Hin Po International Logistics Ltd ((2016) 19 HKCFAR 586)
      case-law
    • Hong Kong Civil Procedure 2020
      academic

Matter record

Report a correction

GM1 and GM2 v KC (High Court of Hong Kong HCCT 60/2019) · Matter