Arbitral Digest

Matter

Golong Co., Ltd v Sesderma, S.L. (CIETAC Zhejiang arbitrations)

  1. 3 July 2020Arbitration

    3 July 2020Arbitration

    CIETAC Zhejiang Arbitral Award in Golong Co., Ltd's arbitration dated 3 July 2020

    China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Zhejiang

    Decision summary
    The tribunal found Sesderma, S.L. in breach of the 2018 Distributorship Agreement and ordered it to continue performing its obligations, terminate conflicting third-party authorizations and business relationships, bear marketing costs of RMB 1,181,664.95 and USD 161,211.03, and provide Golong Co., Ltd with sample products worth EUR 890,833.27 or pay the equivalent amount.

    Supporting details

    4 participants
    Golong Co., Ltd
    Sesderma, S.L.
    China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Zhejiang
    Arbitrator
    Niu Lei
  2. 3 July 2020Arbitration

    3 July 2020Arbitration

    CIETAC Zhejiang Arbitral Award in Sesderma, S.L.'s arbitration dated 3 July 2020

    China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Zhejiang

    Decision summary
    The tribunal ordered Golong Co., Ltd to pay Sesderma, S.L. over EUR 2 million.

    Supporting details

    4 participants
    Golong Co., Ltd
    Sesderma, S.L.
    China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission Zhejiang
    Arbitrator
    Niu Lei

    8 months and 9 days later · 252 days

  3. 12 March 2021Hong Kong

    12 March 2021Hong Kong

    Decision of the High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance in the case HCMP 1646/2020 dated 12 March 2021

    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCMP 1646/2020
    Decision summary
    The court granted Golong Co., Ltd an injunction restraining Sesderma, S.L. from presenting a winding-up petition. It held that Golong had a genuine and serious cross-claim, including claims arising from Sesderma's alleged failure to comply with the 3 July 2020 award and the distributorship agreement, and made a costs order nisi in Golong's favour with a certificate for two counsel.

    Supporting details

    2 authorities · 8 participants
    Golong Co., Ltd
    Representative
    Rachael Lam SC (For: Golong Co., Ltd)
    Representative
    Cherry Xu (For: Golong Co., Ltd)
    Representative
    Wilkinson & Grist (For: Golong Co., Ltd)
    Sesderma, S.L.
    Representative
    Sonny Payne (For: Sesderma, S.L.)
    Representative
    Georgiou Payne Stewien LLP (For: Sesderma, S.L.)
    High Court of Hong Kong, Court of First Instance

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Re Sinom (Hong Kong) Ltd ([2009] 5 HKLRD 487)
      case-law
    • American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd ([1975] AC 396)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Golong Co., Ltd v Sesderma, S.L. (CIETAC Zhejiang arbitrations) · Matter