Arbitral Digest

Matter

Himbalt Trade OU v Mega Group LLC (Supreme Court of Ukraine case 824/73/25)

Arbitration between Himbalt Trade OU and Mega Group LLC led to Ukrainian proceedings on the award’s recognition, enforcement, and related attachment measures.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
Case no.
432/2024

Procedural record

  1. 30 May 2025Arbitration

    30 May 2025Arbitration

    Arbitral Award of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry dated 30 May 2025

    International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

    Decision summary
    The tribunal ordered Mega Group LLC to pay Himbalt Trade OU USD 37,407.50 in principal, USD 6,671.86 in penalty, USD 2,771.25 as 3% annual interest, USD 3,231.26 for arbitration costs, and EUR 2,000 for legal costs, for the amounts stated in the enforcement proceedings.

    Participants

    International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

    6 months and 29 days later · 213 days

  2. 29 December 2025Ukraine

    29 December 2025Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 29 December 2025

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court left Ukrplatinum LLC's appeal against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 9 December 2025 without movement and granted ten days from service to remedy the defects. The company had submitted a cassation appeal although the Supreme Court was acting as an appellate court. It was required to submit an appeal compliant with Article 356 of the Civil Procedure Code, provide the required copies or proof of service, and pay the appellate court fee of UAH 2,422.40. Failure to comply would result in the appeal being treated as not filed and returned. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Representative
    A. O. Soldatov (For: Ukrplatinum LLC)
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    A. Yu. Zaitsev

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 24(2), 43, 185, 351(2), 352, 355, 356 and 357(2)
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine on Court Fees, Articles 4(1), 4(2)(1)(9), 4(3) and 6
      statute

    14 days later · 14 days

  3. 12 January 2026Ukraine

    12 January 2026Ukraine

    Ruling on refund of the court fee of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 12 January 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court partly granted Ukrplatinum LLC's court-fee refund application and ordered the Kyiv Treasury office to refund UAH 4,542 paid for the incorrectly framed cassation appeal. It did not direct the transfer of funds to the company's account because the company had to apply to the authority responsible for the relevant budget revenue. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    A. Yu. Zaitsev

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 133
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine on Court Fees (Law of Ukraine No. 3674-VI on Court Fees, Article 7)
      statute
  4. 12 January 2026Ukraine

    12 January 2026Ukraine

    Ruling returning the appeal of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 12 January 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court treated Ukrplatinum LLC's appeal against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 9 December 2025 as not filed and returned it. The company had not provided proof that the appeal and attachments had been served on Mega Group LLC. The court explained that return did not prevent a new appeal once the defects were removed. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    A. Yu. Zaitsev

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 185 and 357
      statute

    7 days later · 7 days

  5. 19 January 2026Ukraine

    19 January 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 19 January 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court restored Ukrplatinum LLC's time limit for appealing the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 9 December 2025 and opened appellate proceedings. Its first appeal, lodged on 26 December 2025, had been returned on 12 January 2026; it promptly filed a new appeal on 15 January 2026. The court requested the case file from the Kyiv Court of Appeal and granted the participants ten days from service to submit responses to the appeal. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Representative
    Yuliia Volodymyrivna Shevchenko (For: Ukrplatinum LLC)
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    O. M. Osiian
    Judge
    N. Yu. Sakara
    Judge
    O. V. Stupak

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 24(2), 351(2), 354(1)-(2), 356, 357, 358(2), 359 and 360
      statute

    17 days later · 17 days

  6. 5 February 2026Ukraine

    5 February 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 5 February 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court completed preparation of Ukrplatinum LLC's appeal against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 9 December 2025 and scheduled an open hearing for 19 February 2026 at 11:00, with notice to the participants. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Representative
    A. O. Soldatov (For: Ukrplatinum LLC)
    Representative
    Yuliia Volodymyrivna Shevchenko (For: Ukrplatinum LLC)
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    O. M. Osiian
    Judge
    N. Yu. Sakara
    Judge
    O. V. Stupak

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 351, 365, 366 and 460
      statute

    1 month and 21 days later · 49 days

  7. 26 March 2026Ukraine

    26 March 2026Ukraine

    Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 26 March 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, First Judicial Chamber

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court partly allowed Ukrplatinum LLC's appeal, quashed the Kyiv Court of Appeal's 9 December 2025 ruling that had closed the private enforcement officer's application to attach money owed to Mega Group LLC, and remitted the matter to the Kyiv Court of Appeal for continued consideration. The court held that the Civil Procedure Code did not provide the legal basis used by the lower court to close this enforcement application after the officer withdrew it.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Representative
    Andrii Oleksandrovych Soldatov (For: Ukrplatinum LLC)
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, First Judicial Chamber
    Judge
    O. M. Osiiana
    Judge
    N. Yu. Sakara
    Judge
    V. V. Serdiuk
    Other
    Court Reporter
    Ye. M. Aleksiia

    Authorities cited

    9
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 10
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 24
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 255
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 351
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 367
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 368
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 374
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 379
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 381-384
      statute

    3 months later · 92 days

  8. 26 June 2026Ukraine

    26 June 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 26 June 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court left private enforcement officer Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko's appeal against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 22 May 2026 without movement. It required a supported application to restore the appeal deadline and payment of the appellate court fee of UAH 532.48. It allowed no more than ten days from service to remedy the defects. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    D. D. Luspenyk

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 185, 354, 356 and 357
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine on Court Fees, Articles 4 and 6
      statute

    1 month and 8 days later · 38 days

  9. 3 August 2026Ukraine

    3 August 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 3 August 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court restored private enforcement officer Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko's appeal deadline and opened appellate proceedings against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 22 May 2026 after the appeal defects were remedied. It requested case 824/73/25 and allowed ten days from receipt for responses. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    D. D. Luspenyk
    Judge
    H. V. Kolomiiets
    Judge
    Yu. V. Cherniak

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 24, 351, 354, 356, 359 and 360
      statute

    1 month and 5 days later · 36 days

  10. 8 September 2026Ukraine

    8 September 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 8 September 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court completed preparation of private enforcement officer Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko's appeal against the Kyiv Court of Appeal's ruling of 22 May 2026 and scheduled an open hearing for 8 October 2026 at 10:00, with notice to the participants. The ruling was not appealable.

    Participants

    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Himbalt Trade OU
    Mega Group LLC
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court
    Judge
    D. D. Luspenyk
    Judge
    H. V. Kolomiiets
    Judge
    Yu. V. Cherniak

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Articles 351, 365, 366 and 460
      statute

    28 days later · 28 days

  11. 6 October 2026Ukraine

    6 October 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, in case 824/73/25 dated 6 October 2026

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, First Judicial Chamber

    Case no.
    824/73/25
    Text
    Citation
    Case 824/73/25
    Decision summary
    The Supreme Court granted Himbalt Trade OU's representative's request to participate in the hearing scheduled for 8 October 2026 by videoconference from outside the court using her own equipment and electronic signature. The videoconference was to use EASYCON, and the ruling took effect on signing and was not appealable.

    Participants

    Himbalt Trade OU
    Representative
    Yuliia Viktorivna Vaha (For: Himbalt Trade OU)
    Vladislav Hennadiyovych Tatarchenko
    Ukrplatinum LLC
    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Civil Cassation Court, First Judicial Chamber
    Judge
    D. D. Luspenyk
    Judge
    H. V. Kolomiiets
    Judge
    Yu. V. Cherniak

    Authorities cited

    2
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 212
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, Article 260
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Himbalt Trade OU v Mega Group LLC (Supreme Court of Ukraine case 824/73/25) · Matter