Arbitral Digest

Matter

Hop Hing Iron Works & Construction Co. Ltd. v ACG Joint Venture (HCA 2533/2002)

Hop Hing and ACG’s construction subcontract arbitration, with Hong Kong litigation over alleged rights to variation works and an application for a stay.

  • Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements

Procedural record

  1. 16 July 2002Hong Kong

    16 July 2002Hong Kong

    Ruling of the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance in the case HCA 2533/2002 dated 16 July 2002

    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance

    Case no.
    HCA 2533/2002
    Decision summary
    The court refused the Plaintiff's application to adjourn the Defendant's application for a stay in favour of arbitration and proceeded to hear the stay application. The dispute concerned alleged obligations relating to variation works under a construction subcontract and had a substantial connection with existing arbitration proceedings between the parties.

    Participants

    Application
    Plaintiff's application for adjournment — Refused
    Hop Hing Iron Works & Construction Co. Ltd.
    Representative
    Lam Kin Hung (For: Hop Hing Iron Works & Construction Co. Ltd.)
    Representative
    M F Ko & Co. (For: Hop Hing Iron Works & Construction Co. Ltd.)
    ACG Joint Venture
    Representative
    Craig Shepherd (For: ACG Joint Venture)
    Representative
    Herbert Smith (For: ACG Joint Venture)
    High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Court of First Instance
    Judge
    A Cheung

    Authorities cited

    1
    • Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Hop Hing Iron Works & Construction Co. Ltd. v ACG Joint Venture (HCA 2533/2002) · Matter