Arbitral Digest

Matter

Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1)

Daimler Financial Services v Argentina concerns an ICSID jurisdictional award on treaty waiting requirements and an ad hoc committee's annulment decision.

  • Investor-state arbitration
  • Setting aside arbitral awards
Case no.
ARB/05/1
Applicable rules
ICSID Arbitration Rules in force as of April 2006

Procedural record

  1. 22 August 2012Arbitration

    22 August 2012Arbitration

    Arbitral Award dated 22 August 2012

    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

    Decision summary
    The Arbitral Tribunal declined jurisdiction after accepting the objection that the Most-Favored-Nation Clause did not authorize the claimant to bypass the requirements of Articles 10(2) and 10(3) of the Treaty.

    Participants

    Daimler Financial Services AG
    Argentine Republic
    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
    Arbitrator
    Pierre-Marie Dupuy
    Arbitrator
    Charles N. Brower
    Arbitrator
    Domingo Bello Janeiro

    2 years, 4 months and 16 days later · 868 days

  2. 7 January 2015Arbitration

    7 January 2015Arbitration

    Decision on Annulment dated 7 January 2015

    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

    Decision summary
    The ad hoc Committee unanimously dismissed in its entirety Daimler Financial Services AG's Application for Annulment of the Award. Each party was ordered to bear its own legal costs and expenses, and Daimler Financial Services AG was ordered to bear the costs of the proceeding, including the Committee members' fees and expenses and the costs of using ICSID facilities.

    Participants

    Daimler Financial Services AG
    Argentine Republic
    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
    Arbitrator
    Florentino Feliciano
    Arbitrator
    John B. Bellinger III
    Arbitrator
    Makhdoom Ali Khan

    Authorities cited

    11
    • Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. Republic of Guinea (ICSID Case No. ARB/84/4)
      case law
    • Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v. United Arab Emirates (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7)
      case law
    • Compania de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3)
      case law
    • Victor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2)
      case law
    • Amco Asia Corporation and others v. Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/1)
      case law
    • Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12)
      case law
    • Siemens A.G. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8)
      case law
    • CDC Group plc v. Republic of Seychelles (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/14)
      case law
    • Wintershall Aktiengesellschaft v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/14)
      case law
    • Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France) (I.C.J. Reports 2008, p. 177)
      case law
    • Granite State Machine Co. Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al. (Award No. 18-30-3, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Reports, vol. 1, at 442)
      case law

Matter record

Report a correction

Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1) · Matter