Matter
Alapli Elektrik B.V. v. Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/13)
- 21 October 2009United States
21 October 2009United States
Procedural Order No. 1 dated 21 October 2009
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal granted one of the Respondent's requests for production of documents.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
2 months and 2 days later · 63 days
- 23 December 2009United States
23 December 2009United States
Order dated 23 December 2009
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal established a schedule for written pleadings.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
7 days later · 7 days
- 30 December 2009United States
30 December 2009United States
Order dated 30 December 2009
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal amended the schedule for written pleadings following a request by the Respondent and consideration of the Claimant's objections.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
22 days later · 22 days
- 21 January 2010United States
21 January 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 2 dated 21 January 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal gave directions concerning the Respondent's second request for document production.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
26 days later · 26 days
- 16 February 2010United States
16 February 2010United States
Order dated 16 February 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal granted certain of the Respondent's requests for document production.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
2 months and 7 days later · 66 days
- 23 April 2010United States
23 April 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 3 dated 23 April 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal declined to bifurcate the proceedings.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
26 days later · 26 days
- 19 May 2010United States
19 May 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 4 dated 19 May 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal approved the parties' joint request to extend the procedural calendar by 90 days.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
1 month and 12 days later · 43 days
- 1 July 2010United States
1 July 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 5 dated 1 July 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal partly granted the Claimant's request for production of documents.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
3 months and 6 days later · 98 days
- 7 October 2010United States
7 October 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 6 dated 7 October 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal partly granted the Respondent's request for production of documents.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
1 month and 19 days later · 50 days
- 26 November 2010United States
26 November 2010United States
Procedural Order No. 7 dated 26 November 2010
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal granted certain of the Claimant's requests for production of documents and noted the Respondent's agreement to produce certain documents.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
1 year, 7 months and 20 days later · 598 days
- 16 July 2012United States
16 July 2012United States
Award in ICSID Case No. ARB/08/13 dated 16 July 2012
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal's majority dismissed with prejudice all claims for lack of jurisdiction under the Netherlands-Turkey BIT and the Energy Charter Treaty. Each side was directed to bear its own legal expenses, and the costs of arbitration were divided equally between the parties.
Supporting details
6 authorities · 18 participantsAlapli Elektrik B.V.
- Representative
- Mr. Robert Volterra (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Mr. Stephen Fietta (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Volterra Fietta (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Ms. Aimee-Jane Lee (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Mr. Charles Claypoole (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Ms. Catriona Paterson (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
- Representative
- Sebastian Seelmann-Eggebert (For: Alapli Elektrik B.V.)
Republic of Turkey
- Representative
- Latham & Watkins (For: Republic of Turkey)
- Representative
- Mr. Stanimir Alexandrov (For: Republic of Turkey)
- Representative
- Ms. Marinn Carlsson (For: Republic of Turkey)
- Representative
- Ms. Jennifer Haworth McCandless (For: Republic of Turkey)
- Representative
- Sidley Austin LLP (For: Republic of Turkey)
- Representative
- Mr. Daniel M. Price (For: Republic of Turkey)
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Arbitrator
- Professor William W. Park
- Arbitrator
- Hon. Marc Lalonde
- Arbitrator
- Professor Brigitte Stern