Arbitral Digest

Matter

Global Trading Resource Corp. and Globex International, Inc. v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/11)

Case no.
ARB/09/11
Applicable rules
ICSID Arbitration Rules in force as of April 2006
  1. 1 December 2010Arbitration

    1 December 2010Arbitration

    Award dated 1 December 2010

    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

    Decision summary
    The Tribunal held that the claims brought by Global Trading Resource Corp. and Globex International, Inc. against Ukraine were manifestly without legal merit within the meaning of Article 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules and rendered the Award on that basis. It made no order as to costs, leaving the costs of the proceeding to lie where they fell.

    Supporting details

    16 authorities · 21 participants
    Global Trading Resource Corp.
    Representative
    Stanley McDermott III (For: Global Trading Resource Corp.)
    Representative
    Claudia T. Salomon (For: Global Trading Resource Corp.)
    Representative
    David S. Wenger (For: Global Trading Resource Corp.)
    Representative
    DLA Piper LLP (US) (For: Global Trading Resource Corp.)
    Globex International, Inc.
    Ukraine
    Representative
    John Willems (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Michael Polkinghorne (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Olga Boltenko (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Nathalie Makowski (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Kristen Young (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Angelica Andre (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    White & Case LLP (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Serhii Sviriba (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Olena Koltko (For: Ukraine)
    Representative
    Magisters (For: Ukraine)
    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
    Arbitrator
    Franklin Berman
    Tribunal secretary
    Aissatou Diop

    Authorities cited

    16
    • Treaty between the United States of America and Ukraine Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (United States-Ukraine Bilateral Investment Treaty, signed 4 March 1994)
      treaty
    • Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention)
      treaty
    • Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969
      treaty
    • Trans-Global Petroleum, Inc. v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/25)
      case-law
    • Brandes Investment Partners, LP v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/3)
      case-law
    • Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Jamaica (ICSID Case No. ARB/74/2)
      case-law
    • Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4)
      case-law
    • Saba Fakes v. Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20)
      case-law
    • Joy Mining Machinery Equipment Ltd v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11)
      case-law
    • Victor Pey Casado v. Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2)
      case-law
    • RSM Production Corporation v. Grenada (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/14)
      case-law
    • Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka v. The Slovak Republic (Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999)
      case-law
    • Biwater Gauff v. Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22)
      case-law
    • Jan de Nul v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13)
      case-law
    • Malaysian Historical Salvors v. Malaysia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10)
      case-law
    • Bayindir v. Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29)
      case-law

Matter record

Report a correction

Global Trading Resource Corp. and Globex International, Inc. v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/11) · Matter