Matter
Tantalum International Ltd. and Emerge Gaming Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/18/22)
- 6 February 2019Arbitration
6 February 2019Arbitration
Procedural Order No. 1
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal established the procedural framework for the arbitration, including the applicable ICSID Arbitration Rules in force from 10 April 2006, English as the procedural language, Dubai, United Arab Emirates as the place of proceeding, and the procedural calendar.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
3 months and 2 days later · 91 days
- 8 May 2019Arbitration
8 May 2019Arbitration
Procedural Order No. 2
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal modified Sections 13.3 and 13.4 of Procedural Order No. 1 concerning administrative filing procedures.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
6 months and 24 days later · 208 days
- 2 December 2019Arbitration
2 December 2019Arbitration
Procedural Order No. 3
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal granted the Respondent's request to bifurcate Preliminary Objection I concerning jurisdiction ratione voluntatis and directed that the Respondent's other preliminary objections be heard with the merits phase, if any.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
6 months and 8 days later · 191 days
- 10 June 2020Arbitration
10 June 2020Arbitration
Procedural Order No. 4
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal issued directions concerning the organization of the hearing on Preliminary Objection I.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
3 months and 28 days later · 120 days
- 8 October 2020Arbitration
8 October 2020Arbitration
Decision on Jurisdiction
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal held that jurisdiction ratione voluntatis was established under Article 13 of the Australia-Egypt BIT for all the Claimants' claims, dismissed the Respondent's Preliminary Objection I in its entirety, dismissed the Claimants' requests for an order requiring Egypt to perform its Article 13(3)(a) obligation within 30 days and for a stay, deferred allocation of arbitration costs and expenses, and dismissed all other requests.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
9 months and 15 days later · 288 days
- 23 July 2021Arbitration
23 July 2021Arbitration
Procedural Order No. 5
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal issued an order concerning production of documents.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
2 months and 19 days later · 81 days
- 12 October 2021Arbitration
12 October 2021Arbitration
Order of the Tribunal Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal took note of the parties' discontinuance of the proceeding under Rule 43(1) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. It also took note of the parties' agreement that the Claimants were solely entitled to any surplus payments made to ICSID after disbursements for proceeding costs, including Tribunal fees and expenses, ICSID administrative fees, and direct expenses.
Supporting details
5 authorities · 8 participantsTantalum International Ltd.
Emerge Gaming Ltd.
Arab Republic of Egypt
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Arbitrator
- Nayla Comair-Obeid
- Arbitrator
- Gordon Smith
- Arbitrator
- Bernardo M. Cremades
- Tribunal secretary
- Luisa Fernanda Torres
- Institutional administrator
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes