Matter
Winshear Gold Corp. v. United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/25)
- 17 March 2021United States
17 March 2021United States
Procedural Order No. 1 dated 17 March 2021
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal established the procedural rules governing the arbitration, including the applicable ICSID Arbitration Rules, tribunal constitution, party representation, cost advances, place of proceeding, procedural language, pleadings, document production, witnesses, experts, hearings, and data protection.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
28 days later · 28 days
- 14 April 2021United States
14 April 2021United States
Procedural Order No. 2 dated 14 April 2021
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal established the transparency regime for the arbitration and the designation, protection, and publication of confidential information.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
7 months and 5 days later · 219 days
- 19 November 2021United States
19 November 2021United States
Procedural Order No. 3 dated 19 November 2021
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal denied the Claimant's request to order the Respondent to pay its share of the initial advance, noted the Respondent's default since 6 October 2021 in paying USD 150,000, invited the Claimant to make the substitute payment within 15 days, and reserved its decision on related costs.
Supporting details
3 authoritiesInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
3 months and 23 days later · 115 days
- 14 March 2022United States
14 March 2022United States
Procedural Order No. 4 dated 14 March 2022
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal partially granted and granted specified Claimant requests for document production, denied the other Claimant requests, and ordered the Respondent to produce responsive documents by 4 May 2022. It partially granted the Respondent's Request No. 1, denied the other Respondent requests, and ordered the Claimant to produce responsive documents by 4 May 2022.
Supporting details
1 authorityInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
9 months and 29 days later · 304 days
- 12 January 2023United States
12 January 2023United States
Procedural Order No. 5 dated 12 January 2023
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal set the organization, format, schedule, attendance, documentation, witness and expert examination, logistics, transparency, and post-hearing cost-submission arrangements for the hearing scheduled for 13 to 16 February 2023 in Washington, D.C., with 17 February 2023 as a reserve day.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
1 month and 10 days later · 41 days
- 22 February 2023United States
22 February 2023United States
Procedural Order No. 6 dated 22 February 2023
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- The Tribunal directed that the hearing audio-video recording be uploaded to the ICSID website, set the procedure for transcript corrections, and directed the Parties to submit simultaneous post-hearing briefs by 3 May 2023 and schedules of costs by 17 May 2023.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
8 months and 10 days later · 252 days
- 1 November 2023United States
1 November 2023United States
Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding dated 1 November 2023
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Decision summary
- Following the Parties' amicable settlement and joint request, the Tribunal took note of the discontinuance of the proceeding under Rule 43(1) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. The Claimant withdrew all claims with prejudice; the Parties agreed to bear their own participation costs and expenses; and the costs of the arbitration were to be borne equally.
Supporting details
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes