Arbitral Digest

Matter

Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1)

Metalclad's investment dispute with Mexico, concerning development and operation of a hazardous-waste landfill and alleged interference by local authorities.

  • International commercial arbitration
Case no.
ARB(AF)/97/1
Seat
Canada
Industry type
Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities
Applicable rules
ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules

Procedural record

  1. 30 August 2000Canada

    30 August 2000Canada

    Award dated 30 August 2000

    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Additional Facility)

    Decision summary
    The Tribunal held that Mexico breached NAFTA Article 1105 by failing to accord fair and equitable treatment and breached Article 1110 through the indirect expropriation of Metalclad's investment in a hazardous-waste landfill project. Mexico was ordered to pay Metalclad USD 16,685,000 within 45 days, with 6% annual compound interest to that date and 6% monthly compound interest thereafter on any unpaid amount. Each party was to bear its own costs and fees and half of the ICSID advance payments.

    Participants

    Metalclad Corporation
    Representative
    Clyde C. Pearce (For: Metalclad Corporation)
    The United Mexican States
    Representative
    Hugo Perezcano Diaz (For: The United Mexican States)
    International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Additional Facility)
    Arbitrator
    Professor Sir Elihu Lauterpacht
    Arbitrator
    Benjamin R. Civiletti
    Arbitrator
    Jose Luis Siqueiros
    Tribunal secretary
    Alejandro A. Escobar
    Other
    Witness
    Julia Carabias Lillo
    Witness
    Horacio Sanchez Unzuetta
    Witness
    Pedro Medellin Milan
    Witness
    Leonel Ramos Torres
    Witness
    Marcia Williams
    Witness
    John Butler III
    Witness
    Grant S. Kesler
    Witness
    Gustavo Carvajal Isunza
    Witness
    Anthony Dabbene
    Witness
    Lee A. Deets
    Witness
    T. Daniel Neveau

    Authorities cited

    9
    • Biloune et al. v. Ghana Investment Centre et al. (95 I.L.R. 183 (1993))
      case law
    • Benvenuti and Bonfant Srl v. Government of the People's Republic of Congo (1 ICSID Reports 330; 21 I.L.M. 758)
      case law
    • AGIP SPA v. Government of the People's Republic of Congo (1 ICSID Reports 306; 21 I.L.M. 737)
      case law
    • Sola Tiles, Inc. v. Iran (14 Iran-U.S. C.T.R. 224 (1987))
      case law
    • Asian Agricultural Products v. Sri Lanka (4 ICSID Reports 246 (1990))
      case law
    • Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Iran (10 Iran-U.S. C.T.R. 121 (1986))
      case law
    • Chorzow Factory (Claim for Indemnity) (Merits), Germany v. Poland (P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 17 (1928))
      case law
    • Mexican General Ecology Law of 1988 (LGEEPA)
      statute
    • Mexican Constitution
      statute

Matter record

Report a correction

Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1) · Matter