Arbitral Digest

Matter

Indus Powertech Inc v Echjay Industries Private Limited

Seat
United Kingdom
Applicable rules
ICC Arbitration Rules
  1. 13 March 2025United Kingdom

    13 March 2025United Kingdom

    ICC Arbitral Award dated 13 March 2025

    International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce

    Decision summary
    The Tribunal upheld 12 of Echjay's claims, rejected Indus's counterclaims, awarded Echjay US$4,132,895 in loss-of-profit damages for breach of clause 3 of the Master Supply Agreement, and granted various injunctive relief.

    Supporting details

    5 participants
    Indus Powertech Inc
    Echjay Industries Private Limited
    International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce
    Arbitrator
    Justice Sikri
    Arbitrator
    Dr. Bodenheimer

    1 year and 28 days later · 393 days

  2. 10 April 2026United Kingdom

    10 April 2026United Kingdom

    Judgment of the England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) in the case CL-2025-000156 dated 10 April 2026

    England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court)

    Case no.
    CL-2025-000156
    Citation
    [2026] EWHC 827 (Comm)
    Decision summary
    The High Court allowed Indus Powertech Inc's section 68(2)(d) challenge to the 13 March 2025 ICC award. It found that the Tribunal had failed to deal with issues concerning Echjay's manufacturing capacity for Shafts 1 and 2 and the lead time for commercial manufacture of the gear rings and pinions, causing substantial injustice, and remitted those issues to the Tribunal.

    Supporting details

    20 authorities · 7 participants
    Application
    Indus Powertech Inc's section 68(2)(d) challenge — Allowed; issues remitted to the Tribunal
    Indus Powertech Inc
    Representative
    Mr Diwan KC (For: Indus Powertech Inc)
    Expert
    Mr Jain (For: Indus Powertech Inc)
    Echjay Industries Private Limited
    Representative
    Mr Plewman KC (For: Echjay Industries Private Limited)
    Expert
    Mr Patel (For: Echjay Industries Private Limited)
    England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court)

    Authorities cited

    20
    • Arbitration Act 1996
      statute
    • Zermalt Holdings SA v Nu-Life Upholstery Repairs Ltd ([1985] 2 EGLR 14)
      case-law
    • Indian Evidence Act
      statute
    • World Trade v. Czarnikow Sugar ([2004] EWHC 2332 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Torch Offshore v. Cable Shipping ([2004] EWHC 7878 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Van Der Giessen-De-Noord v Imtech Marine & Offshore BV ([2008] EWHC 2904)
      case-law
    • Buyuk Camlica v Progress Bulk Carriers ([2011] Bus.LR Digest D99)
      case-law
    • Petrochemical Industries v Dow Chemical ([2012] EWHC 2739 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Transition Feeds v. Itochu Europe ([2013] EWHC 3629 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Secretary of State for the Home Department v Raytheon Systems Ltd ([2014] EWHC 4375 (TCC))
      case-law
    • RAV Bahamas Ltd v Therapy Beach Club Inc ([2021] AC 907 (PC))
      case-law
    • Czech Republic v Diag Human Se ([2024] EWHC 503 (Comm))
      case-law
    • The Republic of Kazakhstan v World Wide Minerals Ltd ([2025] EWHC 452 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA ([2005] UKHL 43)
      case-law
    • Ascot Commodities NV v Olam International Ltd ([2002] CLC 277)
      case-law
    • Fidelity Management SA v Myriad International Holdings BV ([2005] EWHC 1193 (Comm))
      case-law
    • Magdalena Oldendorff ([2008] 1 Lloyd's Rep 7)
      case-law
    • Sonatrach v Statoil Natural Gas ([2014] 2 Lloyd's Rep 252)
      case-law
    • Primera v Jiangsu ([2014] 1 Lloyd's Rep 255)
      case-law
    • 1996 Report of the Departmental Advisory Committee
      academic

Matter record

Report a correction

Indus Powertech Inc v Echjay Industries Private Limited · Matter