Arbitral Digest

Matter

Kenworth Industrial Limited v Xin Gang Power Investments Limited

Case no.
HKIAC/PA22212
  1. 11 November 2022British Virgin Islands

    11 November 2022British Virgin Islands

    Judgment of the High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands in the cases BVIHC (COM) 2022/0053 and BVIHC (COM) 2022/0065 dated 11 November 2022

    High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands, Commercial Division

    Decision summary
    The court refused Xin Gang Power Investments Limited's application for a stay of Kenworth Industrial Limited's winding-up application. It held that the court had discretion whether to stay the just and equitable liquidation application pending arbitration and refused a stay because the paid-up shares and forfeiture issues could not be separated from the other issues and parallel tribunals risked inconsistent findings on witness credibility.

    Supporting details

    16 authorities · 9 participants
    Kenworth Industrial Limited
    Representative
    Alex Hall Taylor KC (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Representative
    James Noble (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Representative
    Helen Wang (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Representative
    Yan Chng (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Xin Gang Power Investments Limited
    Representative
    John Machel KC (For: Xin Gang Power Investments Limited)
    Representative
    James McDermott (For: Xin Gang Power Investments Limited)
    High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands, Commercial Division

    Authorities cited

    16
    • BVI Arbitration Act 2013
      statute
    • BVI Insolvency Act 2003
      statute
    • BVI Business Companies Act 2004
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Rules 2023
      rules
    • FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp
      case
    • C-Mobile Services Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
      case
    • Salford Estates (No 2) Ltd v Altomart Ltd (No 2)
      case
    • Jinpeng Group Ltd v Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd
      case
    • L Capital KDT Ltd v Retribution Ltd
      case
    • Retribution Ltd v L Capital KDT Ltd
      case
    • IS Investment Fund Segregated Portfolio Company v Fair Cheerful Ltd
      case
    • Rangecroft Ltd v Lenox International Holdings Ltd
      case
    • A Creditor v Anonymous Company
      case
    • China Europe International Business School v Chenwei Evergreen Capital LP
      case
    • Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards
      case
    • Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v Silica Investors Ltd
      case

    1 year, 2 months and 21 days later · 447 days

  2. 1 February 2024British Virgin Islands

    1 February 2024British Virgin Islands

    Judgment of the High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands in the case BVIHCOM2023/0006 dated 1 February 2024

    High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands, Commercial Division

    Decision summary
    The court granted Xin Gang Power Investments Limited's application for a stay of Kenworth Industrial Limited's originating application to appoint liquidators, staying the whole application until further order under section 18 of the Arbitration Act 2013 and, alternatively, the court's discretionary or inherent jurisdiction. The court awarded Xin Gang its costs, summarily assessed at US$201,449.03, payable within 14 days.

    Supporting details

    29 authorities · 8 participants
    Kenworth Industrial Limited
    Representative
    Stephen Moverley-Smith KC (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Representative
    James Noble (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Representative
    Yan Chng (For: Kenworth Industrial Limited)
    Xin Gang Power Investments Limited
    Representative
    Robert Nader (For: Xin Gang Power Investments Limited)
    Representative
    Sam Robertson (For: Xin Gang Power Investments Limited)
    High Court of Justice of the British Virgin Islands, Commercial Division

    Authorities cited

    29
    • BVI Arbitration Act 2013
      statute
    • BVI Insolvency Act 2003
      statute
    • BVI Business Companies Act 2004
      statute
    • BVI Interpretation Amendment Act 2013
      statute
    • Civil Procedure Rules 2023
      rules
    • Eastern Caribbean Civil Procedure Rules 2000
      rules
    • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Articles 2A and 8
      treaty/model law
    • Family Mart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corporation
      case
    • Hualon Corporation (M) Sdn Bhd v Marty Limited
      case
    • Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils Ltd
      case
    • Tugushev v Orlov
      case
    • Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International
      case
    • Sodzawiczny v Ruhan
      case
    • Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov
      case
    • Enka Insaat ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Co Chubb
      case
    • Bridgehouse (Bradford No. 2) Limited v BAE Systems Plc
      case
    • Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd v 7 Petroprod Ltd
      case
    • Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards
      case
    • Joint Stock Co Aeroflot Russian Airlines v Berezovsky
      case
    • China Europe International Business School v Chengwei Evergreen Capital LP
      case
    • Ennio Zanotti v Interlog Finance Corp, BVIHC2009/0394
      case
    • Salford Estates (No 2) Ltd v Altomart Ltd (No 2)
      case
    • Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Changtel Solutions Ltd
      case
    • Applied Enterprises Limited v Interisle Holdings Ltd
      case
    • C-Mobile Services Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
      case
    • Sian Participation Corp v Halimeda International Limited
      case
    • Siong Beng Seng v Caldicott Worldwide Ltd
      case
    • Strachan v The Gleaner Co Ltd and Another
      case
    • Tomolugen Holdings Ltd v Silica Investors Ltd
      case
  3. Date not availableArbitration

    Date not availableArbitration

    Ruling of the arbitral tribunal in HKIAC/PA22212 dated 30 July 2023

    Decision summary
    The tribunal determined that the paid-up shares and forfeiture issues were capable of arbitration and fell within the scope of the arbitration agreement.

    Supporting details

    2 participants
    Kenworth Industrial Limited
    Xin Gang Power Investments Limited

Matter record

Report a correction

Kenworth Industrial Limited v Xin Gang Power Investments Limited · Matter