Arbitral Digest

Matter

Kyiv Court of Appeal, case No. 752/17971/24

Kyiv Court of Appeal reviewed ZAT “Veika”'s request to enforce a Lithuanian judgment against OSOBA_1 and upheld the first-instance ruling on enforcement.

Procedural record

  1. 18 August 2021Lithuania

    18 August 2021Lithuania

    Judgment of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court in civil case No. e2-2489-619/2021 dated 18 August 2021

    Vilnius Regional Administrative Court

    Case no.
    e2-2489-619/2021
    Decision summary
    The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court ordered OSOBA_2 and OSOBA_1 to pay Closed Joint-Stock Company “Veika” EUR 138,000, EUR 136,500 in penalty, 5% annual interest from 23 June 2021 until full payment, and EUR 5,333 in legal costs.

    Participants

    Closed Joint-Stock Company “Veika”
    OSOBA_2
    OSOBA_1
    Vilnius Regional Administrative Court

    4 years, 8 months and 26 days later · 1730 days

  2. 14 May 2026Ukraine

    14 May 2026Ukraine

    Ruling of the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv dated 14 May 2026

    Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv

    Decision summary
    The Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv left without consideration ZAT “Veika”'s request to recognize and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court's judgment for monetary recovery from OSOBA_1.

    Participants

    Closed Joint-Stock Company “Veika”
    OSOBA_1
    Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv

    3 months and 26 days later · 118 days

  3. 9 September 2026Ukraine

    9 September 2026Ukraine

    Resolution of the Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case No. 752/17971/24 dated 9 September 2026

    Kyiv Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    752/17971/24
    Decision summary
    The Kyiv Court of Appeal dismissed ZAT “Veika”'s appeal and left unchanged the ruling of the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv dated 14 May 2026, which had left without consideration the request to recognize and permit enforcement in Ukraine of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court's 18 August 2021 judgment for monetary recovery from OSOBA_1. The appellate court held that the request did not establish that OSOBA_1 had acquired the deceased OSOBA_2's interest in Independent Recruiting Agency LLC in a manner supporting enforcement in Ukraine.

    Participants

    Application
    Appeal against the ruling of the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv dated 14 May 2026 — Dismissed
    Closed Joint-Stock Company “Veika”
    Representative
    Andrii Yevhenovych Kubko (For: Closed Joint-Stock Company “Veika”)
    OSOBA_1
    OSOBA_2
    Independent Recruiting Agency LLC
    Representative
    Dmytro Volodymyrovych Mykhailenko (For: Independent Recruiting Agency LLC)
    Kyiv Court of Appeal
    Judge
    Mykhailo Andriiovych Yavorskyi
    Judge
    Tetiana Tsymbaliukivna Kashperska
    Judge
    Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Finahieiev
    Court clerk
    A.M. Marchenko

    Authorities cited

    11
    • Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine “On Private International Law”
      statute
    • Treaty between Ukraine and the Republic of Lithuania of 7 July 1993
      treaty
    • Civil Code of Ukraine
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine “On Business Companies”
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine “On Limited and Additional Liability Companies”
      statute
    • Law of Ukraine “On State Registration of Legal Entities, Individual Entrepreneurs and Public Formations”
      statute
    • Resolution No. 7 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 30 May 2008
      case
    • Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, 8 June 2021, case No. 906/1336/19, proceeding No. 12-2gs21
      case
    • Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, 7 November 2018, case No. 488/5027/14-ts, proceeding No. 14-256ts18
      case
    • Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, 30 June 2020, case No. 19/028-10/13, proceeding No. 12-158gs19
      case

Matter record

Report a correction

Kyiv Court of Appeal, case No. 752/17971/24 · Matter