Arbitral Digest

Matter

Oberlin v Ovidiu (DIFC Courts ARB 008/2026)

Arbitration between Oberlin and Ovidiu over a 12-villa construction sub-contract, with DIFC proceedings on anti-suit relief, award enforcement, and permission to appeal.

  • International commercial arbitration
  • Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards
  • Setting aside arbitral awards
  • Anti-suit injunctions
  • Parallel proceedings
  • Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements
  • Construction arbitration
Case no.
ARB 008/2026
Seat
United Arab Emirates

Procedural record

  1. 5 December 2025United Arab Emirates

    5 December 2025United Arab Emirates

    Final Award dated 5 December 2025

    Decision summary
    The sole arbitrator awarded Oberlin an amount equal to the sums Oberlin had been required to pay under the Abu Dhabi judgment, AED 665,310.43 under Oberlin's final statement of account, plus interest and costs.

    Participants

    Oberlin (Middle East) LLC
    Ovidiu
    Institution
    Arbitrator
    Rohit Singhal

    10 months and 17 days later · 321 days

  2. 22 October 2026United Arab Emirates

    22 October 2026United Arab Emirates

    Order with Reasons of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Court of Appeal in the case ARB 008/2026 dated 22 October 2026

    Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Court of Appeal

    Case no.
    ARB 008/2026
    Citation
    DIFC Courts, ARB 008/2026, 22 October 2026
    Decision summary
    The Court dismissed Ovidiu's application to adduce additional evidence and its application for permission to appeal against the orders concerning recognition and enforcement of the DIFC-seated award. It held that the proposed appeal had no prospect of success and ordered Ovidiu to pay the costs.

    Participants

    Oberlin (Middle East) LLC
    Ovidiu
    Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Court of Appeal
    Judge
    Wayne Martin
    Court registrar
    Hayley Norton

    Authorities cited

    3
    • DIFC Arbitration Law, Articles 41 and 44
      statute
    • Rules of the DIFC Courts (RDC 43.62, 43.70, 44.5, 44.8, 44.19, 44.31, 44.114-115 and 44.117)
      court rules
    • Ladd v Marshall
      case law

Matter record

Report a correction

Oberlin v Ovidiu (DIFC Courts ARB 008/2026) · Matter